zap

Blazing-fast structured logging library for Go from Uber. Provides two interfaces: Logger (zero-allocation, maximum performance) and SugaredLogger (more convenient, slightly slower). Outputs structured JSON logs ideal for log aggregation platforms (Datadog, ELK, Loki). 4-10x faster than other Go structured loggers.

Evaluated Mar 07, 2026 (0d ago) v1.x
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Developer Tools go golang logging structured-logging performance json uber observability
⚙ Agent Friendliness
69
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
95
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
94
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
--
Documentation
88
Error Messages
85
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
100

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
100
Auth Strength
100
Scope Granularity
100
Dep. Hygiene
92
Secret Handling
80

Be careful not to log sensitive data (tokens, passwords, PII) in structured fields — all fields are exported to log sinks. No network calls — outputs to configured writers.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
100
Version Stability
92
Breaking Changes
90
Error Recovery
95
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You're building a production Go service or agent backend where logging performance and structured JSON output for log aggregation are requirements.

Avoid When

You just need simple log output in a tool or script — log.Printf from the standard library is simpler; zap's setup overhead isn't worth it for scripts.

Use Cases

  • Add high-performance structured logging to Go agent services with zero-allocation JSON output for log aggregation
  • Log agent tool calls, LLM API requests, and task completions with typed fields (String, Int, Duration) for searchability
  • Build production Go agent backends where logging overhead is a concern — zap adds <100ns per log statement
  • Output structured agent logs to stdout for container platforms (Docker, Kubernetes) that aggregate via fluentd/filebeat
  • Implement log sampling for high-volume Go agent operations to reduce log volume while maintaining visibility

Not For

  • Simple Go scripts or tools where fmt.Println or log.Printf is sufficient
  • Applications requiring human-readable console output without JSON — use zerolog or logrus for colored console output
  • Teams prioritizing API simplicity over performance — logrus has a more familiar API at the cost of some performance

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
Yes
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: none
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Local logging library — no authentication required.

Pricing

Model: open_source
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

MIT license. Open-sourced by Uber Technologies.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
Full
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • zap.NewProduction() and zap.NewDevelopment() create loggers with different defaults — production uses JSON, development uses console format; always use production config in deployed agents
  • Logger is not goroutine-safe for configuration changes but is safe for concurrent logging — share a single *zap.Logger across goroutines; don't create per-request loggers
  • SugaredLogger's With() method returns a new SugaredLogger (not mutating) — always capture the returned logger; discarding the return value loses the added fields
  • Caller skip in zap.WithOptions(zap.AddCallerSkip(n)) must be set correctly when wrapping zap in your own logger helper — incorrect skip shows wrong file/line in logs
  • zap doesn't automatically log to stderr on panic/fatal — it logs to the configured core output; ensure sink handles fatal-level messages before process exit
  • Field types must match — passing a string to zap.Int() causes a build error; use zap.Any(key, value) for dynamic types when field type is unknown at compile time

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for zap.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-07.

6328
Packages Evaluated
26150
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered