ask

ASK (Agent Skills Kit) is a Go-based CLI (and optional web/desktop UI) for managing “agent skills” from multiple sources. It installs/uninstalls skills, syncs them across multiple agent products (e.g., Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, OpenClaw), supports version locking via an ask.lock file, and provides a security scanning/audit workflow plus offline/private-repo support.

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (22d ago)
Repo ↗ Infrastructure agent-skills cli security-scanning version-locking offline-mode dependency-auditing web-ui desktop-app
⚙ Agent Friendliness
40
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
39
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
30
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
0
Documentation
65
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
80
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
60
Auth Strength
40
Scope Granularity
0
Dep. Hygiene
45
Secret Handling
50

The README claims a built-in security scanner (26+ rules) with SARIF output and mentions offline mode, private repo support, source whitelists, and HTML audit reports. However, the provided content does not specify how TLS is enforced, how credentials/secrets are stored or redacted, what dependency scanning cadence is used, or how scanner findings are prevented from being silently ignored—so scores reflect partial/marketing-level evidence.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
50
Breaking Changes
40
Error Recovery
30
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want one consistent, version-locked set of third-party agent skills across multiple agent tools, and you value a built-in security scanning/audit step during install/update.

Avoid When

You need a stable, well-specified public HTTP API for integrations; you only want to manage skills for a single agent ecosystem without cross-tool synchronization needs.

Use Cases

  • Keeping skill installations synchronized across multiple agent platforms
  • Reproducible skill installs in CI/CD using a lock file
  • Auditing third-party skill repositories with automated security rules and SARIF-style output
  • Managing skill sources (adding repositories and syncing local caches)
  • Generating agent system prompt materials (e.g., via ask skill prompt)

Not For

  • A hosted API for programmatic skill management as a service (it appears primarily CLI-driven)
  • Use cases requiring formal, externally documented REST/GraphQL contracts for third-party integrations
  • Environments where any downloading/syncing from public sources is disallowed without strong allowlisting

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: Authentication details for accessing skill sources/endpoints are not specified in the provided README.
OAuth: No Scopes: No

The README does not describe an external authentication mechanism (OAuth/API keys/scopes) for ASK itself. Usage appears to be local (CLI) and pulls from repositories; private repo support likely requires credentials, but details are not provided in the supplied content.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No pricing or paid tiers are described in the provided README; repository/license indicates an open-source tool (MIT), but hosting costs (if any) are not covered.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • This tool appears to be CLI-based; agent integrations that expect a stable HTTP API may require custom wrapping.
  • Skill installs from third-party repositories can carry risk; rely on the documented security scan workflow before deploying to agents.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for ask.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered