visiblyai-mcp-server

Provides an MCP server that exposes VisiblyAI SEO tools to Claude Code, including local/free SEO helper tools and paid API-powered analysis tools (credits-based), plus tools that can query connected Google Search Console/GA4 data via the VisiblyAI platform.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (17d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Ai Ml mcp seo claude-code keyword-research on-page-seo analytics google-search-console ga4 python
⚙ Agent Friendliness
48
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
54
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
18
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
55
Documentation
60
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
80
Rate Limits
20

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
70
Auth Strength
70
Scope Granularity
20
Dep. Hygiene
40
Secret Handling
60

README indicates Bearer token usage over HTTP and API key via environment variable for local stdio mode. It does not document TLS guarantees beyond typical HTTPS usage, rate-limit behavior, or how errors/logs handle secrets. Dependency list is minimal but does not provide vulnerability/CVE status.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
30
Breaking Changes
20
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Best When

Used from Claude Code via MCP to perform SEO research, validation, and audits interactively with a mix of free local tools and credit-consuming remote/API tools.

Avoid When

Avoid for workflows that cannot tolerate missing details on error codes, rate limits, or data-handling guarantees—especially for paid API calls and Google-connected queries.

Use Cases

  • Classify keyword intent and funnel stage for SEO planning
  • Generate SEO checklists and best-practice guidance
  • Run URL structure checks and perform on-page SEO audits
  • Validate structured data, hreflang, sitemaps, and discover broken links
  • Analyze traffic, competitors, backlinks, SERPs, and PageSpeed/Core Web Vitals
  • Query connected GSC/GA4 properties for performance by query/page/country/device

Not For

  • Teams needing a documented public REST/GraphQL/SDK interface outside of MCP
  • Use cases requiring strict on-prem/no-external-network operation for all features
  • Applications that need guaranteed, published uptime/SLA

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: MCP over HTTP with Authorization: Bearer <API key> MCP over stdio for local tool mode with VISIBLYAI_API_KEY env var (for paid tools) Google OAuth tokens connected via VisiblyAI platform (for GSC/GA4 query tools)
OAuth: Yes Scopes: No

Paid tools require VISIBLYAI_API_KEY. Some tools use the user's Google OAuth connections managed via the VisiblyAI platform; README does not describe OAuth scopes explicitly.

Pricing

Model: Credits-based (monthly tiers) + free local tools (
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

Paid tools are described as requiring an API key and using credits; Google-connected tools are described as requiring an API key but 0 credits.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Some tools require an API key and will fail or be limited when VISIBLYAI_API_KEY is missing/insufficient.
  • Paid tools consume credits; agents should avoid unbounded repeated calls (e.g., crawls/workflows) without cost awareness.
  • Google-connected tools rely on user-managed connections via VisiblyAI; availability depends on proper OAuth connection setup.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for visiblyai-mcp-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered