uptime-kuma-mcp-server
Provides an MCP server that lets an MCP-capable agent manage Uptime Kuma monitors (batch add, list, and delete) by calling MCP tools that in turn use the Uptime Kuma API. Includes a simple way to run an SSE endpoint via FastMCP/uvicorn.
Score Breakdown
⚙ Agent Friendliness
🔒 Security
The service is configured with KUMA_USERNAME and KUMA_PASSWORD environment variables, which is better than hardcoding secrets, but the README does not describe whether the MCP/SSE endpoint is authenticated/authorized. No info is provided about TLS termination for inbound traffic. Batch actions (add/delete) imply high-impact operations; without MCP-side auth and rate limiting guidance, misuse risk is elevated.
⚡ Reliability
Best When
You want an agent-compatible interface to administer Uptime Kuma monitors and you can run the server in a controlled network while supplying Uptime Kuma credentials via environment variables.
Avoid When
Avoid when you cannot secure the MCP endpoint and secrets, or when you require documented retry/idempotency semantics and clear error-code contracts.
Use Cases
- • Automating creation of Uptime Kuma monitors from an AI workflow
- • Programmatically auditing and cleaning up monitors (list/delete) via MCP
- • Batch operations on monitors as part of infrastructure management or CI tasks
Not For
- • Direct public exposure of an MCP service without access controls
- • Use cases requiring fine-grained authorization per tool/action
- • Environments needing published SLAs or strong guarantees about API stability
Interface
Authentication
Authentication is described only as username/password for the upstream Uptime Kuma API. The MCP/SSE server itself does not show any auth mechanism in the provided README.
Pricing
No pricing information provided; appears to be a self-hosted open-source package.
Agent Metadata
Known Gotchas
- ⚠ README does not describe idempotency or how duplicate URLs/monitor creation is handled when calling add_monitors repeatedly.
- ⚠ Upstream Uptime Kuma communication errors and MCP tool error mapping are not documented, so agents may need defensive retries with care.
Alternatives
Full Evaluation Report
Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for uptime-kuma-mcp-server.
AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes
Package Brief
Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.
Delivered within 10 minutes
Score Monitoring
Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.
Continuous monitoring
Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.