gocd-server

GoCD server implementation providing CI/CD orchestration with pipeline configuration, agent-based job execution, and web/API interfaces for managing pipelines, materials, and runs.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (25d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Infrastructure ci-cd devtools automation build-orchestration self-hosted
⚙ Agent Friendliness
15
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
46
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
30
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
0
Documentation
0
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
40
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
50
Auth Strength
50
Scope Granularity
30
Dep. Hygiene
50
Secret Handling
50

Security characteristics (TLS enforcement details, auth provider options, password/token handling, rate limiting, and secret exposure) are not observable from the provided content. As a self-hosted CI controller, it typically requires careful hardening: network isolation, HTTPS/TLS, strong authentication, least-privilege credentials for agents, and secure storage of SCM/materials credentials.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
40
Breaking Changes
40
Error Recovery
40
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You can deploy and operate a self-hosted GoCD controller and corresponding agents, and you want rich pipeline orchestration with an existing GoCD-compatible ecosystem.

Avoid When

You need a simple HTTP-only stateless service with minimal operational overhead or you cannot secure/maintain the server and agents.

Use Cases

  • Self-hosted CI/CD orchestration for teams using pipelines
  • Coordinating multi-stage workflows with artifact/material tracking
  • Managing automated releases and deployments with approval/gating patterns
  • Integrating build/test workflows via GoCD API (where available) and job agents

Not For

  • Serverless/on-demand managed CI/CD where you cannot operate infrastructure
  • Environments requiring OAuth-only SaaS-style auth without handling server users
  • Highly constrained environments where running a full controller is impractical

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: User accounts/roles (controller UI and associated endpoints, as is typical for GoCD servers)
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Auth method specifics (e.g., LDAP/SAML/OAuth support, token types, scope model) are not provided in the supplied content, so only generic server authentication is assumed based on typical GoCD capabilities.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

GoCD server is generally open-source/self-hosted; no hosted pricing information was provided.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for gocd-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered