routersploit

RouterSploit is an open-source Python exploitation framework for embedded devices. It provides modular components for exploitation, credential checking, vulnerability scanning, payload generation, and generic attacks, run via a CLI entry point (e.g., rsf.py) and optionally via Docker.

Evaluated Mar 29, 2026 (0d ago)
Repo ↗ Security ai-ml security exploitation embedded router scanner bruteforce creds payloads python
⚙ Agent Friendliness
28
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
16
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
26
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
0
Documentation
30
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
0
Auth Strength
10
Scope Granularity
0
Dep. Hygiene
40
Secret Handling
40

As a local exploitation framework, it inherently increases risk of misuse. README lists dependencies (requests, paramiko, pysnmp, pycrypto) and suggests potential use of Bluetooth support via bluepy; no information is provided about secure transport policies, secret handling practices, or vulnerability management for dependencies. No auth model is applicable beyond user-operated targeting.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
45
Breaking Changes
40
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Best When

Used in controlled penetration-testing workflows against embedded devices where you have permission, and where you can operate a local Python toolchain.

Avoid When

You need a well-defined remote API/SDK for integration, or you require strict security governance and minimal risk of misuse.

Use Cases

  • Security testing of embedded/router targets with explicit authorization
  • Scanning for potentially vulnerable services on embedded devices
  • Credential testing modules against network services
  • Selecting and running exploit modules for known embedded-device weaknesses
  • Generating payloads for various architectures/injection points

Not For

  • Unauthorized access or exploitation of systems
  • Production systems requiring strong safety rails/guardrails
  • Programmatic use as a stable SaaS/API service (it is a local framework)
  • Environments where automated credential attacks are prohibited

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

No product authentication mechanism is described; it is a local tool run by the user against targets.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Open-source (BSD license mentioned). No hosted pricing details provided.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • No explicit agent-friendly API/MCP; automation likely requires invoking the CLI and parsing output.
  • Framework updates are described as frequent and may change module behavior; pin versions for repeatability.
  • Includes modules for credential testing and exploitation, which may require strict policy controls.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for routersploit.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-29.

5347
Packages Evaluated
21056
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered