mcp-server

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that exposes Tekton (pipeline/task/pipelinerun/taskrun) operations as MCP tools, including listing, creating/updating/patching, deleting, starting/restarting, and integration with Artifact Hub to discover/install/trigger Tekton tasks and pipelines.

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (21d ago)
Repo ↗ Automation mcp tekton kubernetes artifacthub automation devtools workflow-orchestration
⚙ Agent Friendliness
46
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
27
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
22
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
55
Documentation
65
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
25
Rate Limits
10

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
30
Auth Strength
25
Scope Granularity
15
Dep. Hygiene
40
Secret Handling
30

No TLS/auth/secret-handling details are provided in the README. Since the server performs cluster operations and accepts YAML, the primary security posture likely relies on Kubernetes RBAC and the deployment environment rather than documented MCP-layer protections.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
40
Breaking Changes
30
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You have an MCP-capable agent/runtime and a secured Kubernetes/Tekton environment where the agent should manage Tekton resources and optionally install/trigger community Tekton content via Artifact Hub.

Avoid When

You need documented authentication, authorization model, rate limiting behavior, or robust error/idempotency semantics at the MCP/tooling layer (not shown in the provided README).

Use Cases

  • Agent-driven management of Tekton resources (CRUD, start/restart) in Kubernetes clusters
  • Querying Tekton objects (pipelines, tasks, runs) with simple filtering inputs
  • Automating deployment of Tekton tasks/pipelines from Artifact Hub and triggering them
  • Building chat/agent workflows that operate on Tekton resources via MCP tool calls

Not For

  • Public, internet-facing control planes without cluster-level security hardening
  • Use cases requiring strong audit logging and fine-grained RBAC guarantees as part of the MCP layer (not evidenced in README)
  • Highly cost-sensitive automation where rate limiting and workload limits are critical (not documented)

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

No authentication/authorization mechanism is described in the provided README (e.g., API keys, OAuth, or required Kubernetes RBAC assumptions).

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Open-source project; no pricing information provided.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Create operations accept raw YAML; the agent must generate valid Tekton YAML and ensure required fields are present.
  • Start/restart/delete operations are potentially destructive or state-changing; agents should confirm intent and namespaces.
  • Filtering and selector inputs require correct formatting (e.g., label/field selectors) to avoid unintended resource sets.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for mcp-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered