summary-stack-obsidian-mcp-server

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server package intended to integrate with Obsidian to provide “summary stack” observation/summary-related functionality to AI agents via MCP tools.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (21d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ DevTools mcp obsidian notes summarization agent-integration
⚙ Agent Friendliness
39
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
23
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
21
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
45
Documentation
30
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
60
Rate Limits
10

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
20
Auth Strength
20
Scope Granularity
10
Dep. Hygiene
40
Secret Handling
30

No concrete security implementation details were provided. As an MCP server, it may run locally, reducing network exposure, but it still may read/write local note content; ensure least-privilege access and avoid logging secrets. TLS/auth/scopes cannot be verified from the provided information.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
30
Breaking Changes
30
Error Recovery
25
AF Security Reliability

Use Cases

  • Connect an AI agent to an Obsidian vault context via MCP
  • Summarize or extract information from notes using an MCP tool interface
  • Build agent workflows that read (and possibly act on) Obsidian content using MCP tool calls

Not For

  • Directly serving end-user web/API traffic (non-MCP use)
  • Handling sensitive enterprise auth/data without clear security guidance
  • Use as a standalone summarization model provider (it’s an integration layer, not the model)

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

No auth details were provided in the supplied information; MCP servers commonly run locally and may rely on client-side configuration, but this cannot be confirmed here.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No pricing information was provided.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • MCP servers that target local apps (e.g., Obsidian) may depend on local filesystem/vault availability and may fail when the vault path/permissions aren’t set.
  • If tool schemas are incomplete or loosely typed, agents may call tools with incorrect parameters.
  • Without documented error codes and retry guidance, agents may not reliably recover from transient failures (e.g., file not found, vault locked).

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for summary-stack-obsidian-mcp-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered