ScyllaDB API

Apache Cassandra-compatible NoSQL wide-column database written in C++ delivering sub-millisecond p99 latency and 10x Cassandra throughput, with a REST API for administration and the native Cassandra CQL protocol for data operations.

Evaluated Mar 06, 2026 (0d ago) vcurrent
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Other scylladb cassandra nosql wide-column cql low-latency c++ time-series iot cloud
⚙ Agent Friendliness
57
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
79
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
86
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
--
Documentation
80
Error Messages
72
Auth Simplicity
72
Rate Limits
80

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
85
Auth Strength
78
Scope Granularity
75
Dep. Hygiene
85
Secret Handling
75

TLS available for client-to-node and inter-node communication but requires manual configuration on self-hosted installs. ScyllaDB Cloud enforces TLS. Authentication via username/password with SASL. Enterprise adds LDAP and Kerberos. AGPL v3 license source transparency supports dependency hygiene review.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
88
Version Stability
85
Breaking Changes
82
Error Recovery
88
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You need Cassandra-compatible wide-column storage at much lower latency and higher throughput than Apache Cassandra, especially for time-series or high-cardinality workloads requiring horizontal scale.

Avoid When

Your team lacks Cassandra data modeling experience, your data model requires ad-hoc querying with flexible filtering, or your scale does not justify the operational complexity.

Use Cases

  • High-throughput agent event storage where Cassandra API compatibility is needed but Cassandra latency is too high
  • Time-series sensor and IoT data at massive scale with predictable single-digit millisecond read latency
  • User profile and session storage for real-time personalization agents requiring consistent low-latency reads
  • Leaderboard and counter workloads leveraging Cassandra's distributed counter column type
  • Agent state persistence at scale where horizontal partitioning across many nodes is required

Not For

  • Relational data with complex JOIN requirements — ScyllaDB is not a relational database
  • Teams without Cassandra data modeling expertise — partition key design is critical and non-obvious
  • Small-scale applications where PostgreSQL or DynamoDB would be simpler to operate

Interface

REST API
Yes
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
Yes
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: username_password
OAuth: No Scopes: Yes

Authentication uses Cassandra-compatible SASL/username-password over the CQL protocol. ScyllaDB Enterprise adds LDAP, Kerberos, and role-based authorization (system_auth keyspace). ScyllaDB Cloud uses API keys for the management plane and standard CQL auth for data plane connections. Authorization at keyspace, table, and operation level via Cassandra GRANT syntax.

Pricing

Model: open_source_with_saas
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: Yes

Open source community edition is free under AGPL v3. ScyllaDB Enterprise adds proprietary features (incremental compaction, advanced security). ScyllaDB Cloud is the managed offering. Serverless tier (in preview) provides elastic scaling with consumption-based pricing.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
token
Idempotent
Partial
Retry Guidance
Documented

Known Gotchas

  • Data model must be designed around query patterns — table-per-query is standard; agents that try to add filters on non-partition-key columns will fail or cause full-table scans
  • Consistency level tuning is required for agent workloads — QUORUM provides the right balance but agents often default to ONE which can return stale data
  • Cassandra's CQL ALLOW FILTERING is a trap — it enables full scans that can take minutes on large datasets; agents should never use it in production queries
  • Counter columns cannot be mixed with regular columns in the same table — a frequent schema design mistake
  • ScyllaDB's shard-per-core architecture means connection pooling should target all shards — drivers must be configured for topology-aware load balancing
  • TTL (time to live) on rows does not immediately reclaim space — compaction must run to free disk space after expiry
  • Lightweight transactions (LWT/IF conditions) have much higher latency than regular writes due to Paxos consensus — avoid in hot paths

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Detailed scoring breakdown, competitive positioning, security analysis, and improvement recommendations for ScyllaDB API.

$99

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-06.

5178
Packages Evaluated
26151
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered