rapidocr-mcp-server

Provides an MCP server that exposes OCR capabilities (based on RapidOCR) via two tools: OCR from base64-encoded image content and OCR from an image file path.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (27d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Ai Ml ocr mcp rapidocr python text-extraction agent-tools
⚙ Agent Friendliness
48
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
28
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
32
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
65
Documentation
55
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
20
Auth Strength
10
Scope Granularity
0
Dep. Hygiene
60
Secret Handling
60

No authentication or authorization controls are described. TLS requirements for the MCP transport are not documented. The server likely processes sensitive image data; ensure secure deployment, restrict filesystem access when using ocr_by_path, and review how requests/logs handle base64 image payloads. Dependency list includes substantial ML/runtime components (onnxruntime, rapidocr) and an HTTP library (requests), but CVE status is not provided here.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
55
Breaking Changes
50
Error Recovery
25
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want a lightweight OCR tool available to an MCP-capable agent, and you can provide images via base64 or local paths.

Avoid When

You need strong authentication/authorization controls, documented rate limits, or guaranteed privacy controls for sensitive document images.

Use Cases

  • Agent-assisted extraction of text from images
  • Calling OCR as an MCP tool inside multi-tool agent workflows
  • Converting screenshots or document images to structured text output

Not For

  • Production-grade OCR pipelines that require strict security/compliance guarantees without additional review
  • Environments that cannot supply/handle image files or base64 payloads safely
  • Use cases needing rich OCR metadata (layout, confidence maps) if not provided by the TextContent schema

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

No authentication/authorization mechanism is described in the provided README or manifest snippet; MCP auth (if any) is not documented here.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No pricing information is provided; package appears to be self-hosted open-source (MIT) with local resource usage.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
True
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Prefer ocr_by_content when you cannot expose filesystem paths to the server; ocr_by_path implies the server can access the referenced path.
  • Large images/base64 payloads may increase latency or exceed MCP transport limits; payload size limits are not documented.
  • No rate-limit/retry guidance is provided, so agents may need conservative retry/backoff behavior.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for rapidocr-mcp-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered