qweather-mcp-server

Provides an MCP server that exposes QWeather (weather) data to AI agents via MCP tools, enabling agent-driven weather lookups (e.g., forecasts/current conditions) without the agent directly calling external APIs.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (27d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Ai Ml mcp weather qweather ai-agents integration
⚙ Agent Friendliness
40
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
45
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
19
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
55
Documentation
35
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
50
Rate Limits
20

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
70
Auth Strength
45
Scope Granularity
20
Dep. Hygiene
45
Secret Handling
45

Upstream weather APIs typically require an API key; however, how secrets are stored/handled and whether TLS is enforced are not evidenced in the provided content. No scope/authorization model is visible from the prompt, so least-privilege granularity cannot be confirmed.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
45
Breaking Changes
0
Error Recovery
30
AF Security Reliability

Use Cases

  • • Agent-based weather querying for user assistance
  • • Augmenting chatbots with real-time or forecast weather context
  • • Automated planning/decision support using weather conditions (e.g., travel suggestions)

Not For

  • • Use as a primary weather data platform without verifying data licensing/accuracy
  • • Use where strong enterprise security/compliance controls and audited uptime are required (not evidenced from provided info)
  • • High-throughput workloads where strict rate-limit and retry semantics are mandatory (not documented in provided info)

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: (Likely) API key for QWeather via configuration/environment variables (not confirmed from provided info)
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Authentication details are not present in the provided prompt content; scores reflect uncertainty.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Pricing of the MCP package is not provided. QWeather usage may incur costs depending on the upstream plan, but this is not evidenced here.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • ⚠ Weather queries may be sensitive to location resolution/formatting (e.g., city names vs coordinates); agents may need guidance on correct input formats
  • ⚠ Upstream API quotas may cause failures if the MCP server does not provide clear rate-limit guidance
  • ⚠ If the MCP server returns partial/translated errors from upstream, agents may not be able to recover automatically without explicit error codes

Alternatives

Direct use of QWeather REST APIs (with OpenAPI/SDKs if available) Other weather MCP/server integrations if they provide stronger documented reliability and security guarantees Using a weather aggregation SDK/API directly from your application backend

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for qweather-mcp-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo
API endpoint ↗ Agent guide ↗ Report inaccuracy

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
♥
Community Powered