q-mem-mcp-server

q-mem-mcp-server is an MCP server package intended to expose “memory” (likely a Q-* memory component) to an MCP-capable agent runtime via the Model Context Protocol.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (27d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Ai Ml mcp agent-tools memory q-mem ai-integration
⚙ Agent Friendliness
36
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
14
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
29
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
55
Documentation
35
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
50
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
0
Auth Strength
0
Scope Granularity
0
Dep. Hygiene
40
Secret Handling
40

Security cannot be verified from the provided information. For an agent-facing MCP server, key concerns include transport security (TLS), authentication/authorization, data persistence/retention, and protection against prompt/tool injection through any stored memory content.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
45
Breaking Changes
40
Error Recovery
30
AF Security Reliability

Use Cases

  • Give an MCP-enabled agent access to stored conversational or application memory
  • Prototype agent “long-term memory” features using the MCP protocol
  • Integrate memory capabilities into tools/workflows that already speak MCP

Not For

  • Production-grade memory storage without verifying persistence, retention, and security properties
  • Use where you need a documented REST/GraphQL API contract instead of MCP tools
  • Environments requiring strong auth controls or compliance guarantees not documented by the project

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

No auth details were provided in the provided package information, so authentication approach cannot be confirmed.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Pricing not provided; MCP servers are typically open-source/self-hosted, but this cannot be confirmed.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • MCP servers often require correct tool/transport configuration; without published examples, integration can be brittle.
  • Memory operations may have side effects (writes/updates); ensure the tool semantics are understood before repeated calls.
  • If persistence/backends are not clearly documented, agents may behave inconsistently across restarts.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for q-mem-mcp-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered