pihole-mcp-server

Provides an MCP server (and CLI) to manage a Pi-hole DNS server from AI assistants/IDE clients, supporting both legacy Pi-hole (admin/api.php with API token) and modern Pi-hole (api/* with web interface password).

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (27d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Infrastructure mcp pihole dns automation cli python security networking ide-integration
⚙ Agent Friendliness
54
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
64
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
26
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
78
Documentation
72
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
55
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
90
Auth Strength
65
Scope Granularity
20
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
85

README claims HTTPS support with certificate verification and allows disabling SSL verification; credential storage uses OS keyring with an encrypted-file fallback (AES-256, PBKDF2) and restricts file permissions. However, there is no described authorization model at the MCP server level (no per-tool/action scopes, no approval workflow), so any user/process that can call the MCP server can perform Pi-hole admin actions. Rate limits and detailed error semantics are not documented.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
35
Breaking Changes
30
Error Recovery
40
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You run Pi-hole on a trusted LAN and want an MCP client to automate administrative tasks interactively.

Avoid When

You cannot store credentials securely on the host, or you need strict protections against an agent making destructive/unauthorized changes.

Use Cases

  • Enable/disable Pi-hole DNS blocking for scheduled troubleshooting
  • Query Pi-hole status and DNS blocking statistics
  • Find top blocked domains and view Pi-hole analytics
  • Allow natural-language operations from an MCP-capable IDE/agent

Not For

  • Public/Internet-exposed untrusted automation (without additional network controls)
  • Organizations needing centralized authorization/tenant isolation beyond Pi-hole itself
  • Use cases requiring fine-grained audit trails or approvals per action

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: Legacy Pi-hole API token (admin/api.php) Modern Pi-hole web interface password (api/* endpoints) Local credential storage via system keyring or encrypted file fallback
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Authentication is with Pi-hole credentials stored locally by the MCP server/CLI; there is no end-user OAuth layer or fine-grained scopes at the MCP server interface described in the README.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Open-source (MIT) with no pricing information provided.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Agent may disable Pi-hole for a duration; ensure it asks for/chooses durations carefully.
  • Correct auth method depends on Pi-hole version; if detection fails, credentials may need to be re-entered via login/logout.
  • If SSL verification is disabled (no-verify-ssl), network-in-the-middle risk increases; keep verification enabled when possible.
  • Because credentials are stored locally, ensure the MCP server host is access-controlled to prevent other users/processes from invoking it with stored secrets.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for pihole-mcp-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered