orjson

Fast Python JSON library written in Rust. orjson is 3-10x faster than the standard library json module for serialization and deserialization. Natively serializes Python dataclasses, datetime, numpy arrays, UUID, and Pydantic models without custom encoders. Drop-in replacement for json.dumps/json.loads with better performance and native type support.

Evaluated Mar 07, 2026 (0d ago) v3.10+
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Developer Tools python json serialization rust performance fast dataclasses numpy
⚙ Agent Friendliness
69
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
99
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
92
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
--
Documentation
88
Error Messages
85
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
100

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
100
Auth Strength
100
Scope Granularity
100
Dep. Hygiene
92
Secret Handling
100

Local library with no network access. Rust-based implementation provides memory safety. No security concerns beyond JSON content being processed.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
100
Version Stability
90
Breaking Changes
88
Error Recovery
90
AF Security Reliability

Best When

JSON serialization is a measurable bottleneck in your Python application and you need native dataclass/datetime/numpy support without custom encoders.

Avoid When

JSON is not in your hot path — standard json or ujson are simpler. Use orjson when you've measured that JSON is actually a bottleneck.

Use Cases

  • Serialize large JSON payloads in agent APIs with minimal overhead — replaces json.dumps in hot paths
  • Serialize numpy arrays, datetimes, and Pydantic models to JSON without custom encoders in agent data pipelines
  • High-throughput agent message passing where JSON serialization latency matters at scale
  • FastAPI or Starlette custom response classes that use orjson for faster response serialization
  • Agent data stores that need fast JSON serialization for caching large structured responses

Not For

  • Applications where JSON performance is not a bottleneck — standard json module is simpler with no Rust compilation
  • Complex custom serialization logic — orjson's option flags are limited; for complex cases use custom encoders
  • Environments without Rust toolchain or wheels for the target platform

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
Yes
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: none
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Local Python library — no authentication.

Pricing

Model: open_source
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

Completely free and open source.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
Full
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • orjson.dumps() returns bytes, not str — unlike standard json.dumps(); must call .decode('utf-8') or use OPT_NON_STR_KEYS for string-key dicts
  • orjson does not support all json module options — indent is supported but separators and sort_keys use different flags (OPT_INDENT_2, OPT_SORT_KEYS)
  • Circular references raise JSONEncodeError immediately — same as standard json; no cycle detection option
  • Numpy array serialization requires numpy to be installed — if numpy is not available orjson still works but raises TypeError for ndarray
  • orjson uses a different option API (OPT_* integer flags) vs standard json's keyword arguments — not a true drop-in for code using json module options
  • On platforms without pre-built wheels (some ARM, musl libc), installation requires Rust toolchain — check manylinux/musllinux wheel availability for your target

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for orjson.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-07.

6406
Packages Evaluated
26150
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered