bloodhound_mcp

Provides an MCP server that lets an AI assistant query BloodHound Community Edition data (via BloodHound CE REST API and Neo4j graph) through a set of composite MCP tools (e.g., domain/user/group/computer info, graph analysis, ADCS info, and Cypher execution) and reference resources for Cypher and AD/ADCS/Azure methodology.

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (21d ago)
Repo ↗ DevTools mcp bloodhound active-directory cypher attack-path-analysis neo4j python
⚙ Agent Friendliness
60
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
58
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
25
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
80
Documentation
70
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
80
Rate Limits
10

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
70
Auth Strength
60
Scope Granularity
30
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
75

Requires BloodHound API token credentials (Token ID/Key) provided via .env. README warns that BloodHound data is transmitted to the LLM provider and advises against production use without risk assessment; recommends rotating tokens and using read-only where possible. TLS is implied by default scheme 'https' but explicit enforcement details are not provided. Tool set includes `cypher_query` and OpenGraph CRUD (`custom_nodes`), increasing the need for strict operator/agent guardrails.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
40
Breaking Changes
30
Error Recovery
30
AF Security Reliability

Best When

Used in lab/non-production environments with appropriate API-token scoping and when an operator understands the security implications of sending BloodHound-derived data to an LLM.

Avoid When

Avoid when BloodHound datasets include sensitive production identities/relationships and you have not assessed exposure to your LLM provider; also avoid when robust guardrails for Cypher execution are not in place.

Use Cases

  • Interactive Active Directory attack-path analysis using BloodHound data
  • Generating/assisting Cypher queries against the BloodHound graph
  • Recon and privilege-rights exploration (users/groups/sessions/local admin/etc.)
  • ADCS ESC pathway exploration and exploitation guidance (from templates/resources)
  • Training, lab analysis, and certification prep using non-production AD data

Not For

  • Using with production AD data without a clear privacy/security assessment and mitigations
  • Automating destructive changes to BloodHound data (beyond read-only analysis workflows)
  • Environments where sensitive security telemetry cannot be sent to an external LLM provider

Interface

REST API
Yes
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: BloodHound API token (Token ID + Token Key) via .env
OAuth: No Scopes: No

README indicates use of BloodHound CE API credentials (Token ID/Token Key). It recommends read-only tokens but does not describe scoped permissions or scope granularity for the tool itself.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Open-source tool; costs depend on your BloodHound CE deployment and your LLM provider usage.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • The tool surface includes `cypher_query` and `custom_nodes` which can increase risk if used without guardrails
  • The README references a 'system prompt' tuned for offensive security analysis; agents may follow methodology rules that are not appropriate for all environments

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for bloodhound_mcp.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered