Magentic

Turns Python functions into LLM calls via a @prompt decorator, using type annotations to automatically parse and validate structured outputs with minimal boilerplate.

Evaluated Mar 06, 2026 (0d ago) v0.x
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ AI & Machine Learning python llm structured-output decorator async multi-provider
⚙ Agent Friendliness
64
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
29
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
51
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
--
Documentation
80
Error Messages
75
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
100

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
0
Auth Strength
0
Scope Granularity
0
Dep. Hygiene
82
Secret Handling
85

No network surface; secrets handled by provider SDKs. Minimal dependency footprint reduces supply-chain exposure.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
70
Breaking Changes
65
Error Recovery
70
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want the simplest possible way to call an LLM and get back a typed Python object, without importing a full agent framework.

Avoid When

Your use case involves complex agent state, tool use orchestration, or memory that goes beyond a single decorated function call.

Use Cases

  • Wrapping single LLM calls as typed Python functions for use in agent pipelines without framework overhead
  • Quickly prototyping structured extraction tasks using just a docstring prompt and return type annotation
  • Building async agent steps where each LLM call is an awaitable function with a validated return type
  • Composing multiple typed LLM functions into a lightweight multi-step reasoning chain
  • Switching LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral) behind a stable typed function interface without changing call sites

Not For

  • Complex multi-agent orchestration requiring memory, tool routing, and state management (use LangChain or PydanticAI instead)
  • Token-level constrained generation where output must be mathematically guaranteed (use Outlines instead)
  • Teams that need a full agent framework with tracing, observability, and evaluation tooling built in

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
Yes
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: none
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Library — auth via underlying LLM provider env vars (OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, etc.).

Pricing

Model: open_source
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

Open source MIT. LLM provider API costs apply separately.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
Partial
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • No built-in retry logic — agents must wrap @prompt functions in their own retry/backoff decorator
  • Complex union return types (Optional, Union) can confuse type-based parsing; prefer concrete Pydantic models
  • Global backend configuration via environment variables can cause subtle bugs when multiple backends are used in one process
  • Async @prompt functions require an existing event loop; calling from sync code needs asyncio.run() wrapping
  • Template variable injection uses Python f-string-style syntax — curly braces in prompt text must be escaped or parsing breaks

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Detailed scoring breakdown, competitive positioning, security analysis, and improvement recommendations for Magentic.

$99

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-06.

5173
Packages Evaluated
26151
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered