Lumu Cybersecurity Compromise Assessment REST API

Lumu cybersecurity platform REST API for enterprises and MSPs to continuously measure network compromise through DNS metadata analysis — enabling AI agents to retrieve threat incidents, manage network sensors, assess organizational compromise levels, and integrate threat intelligence with SIEM and PSA platforms through Lumu's real-time compromise assessment platform. Enables AI agents to manage incident management for detected network compromise incident retrieval and status management automation, handle label management for incident investigation and classification workflow automation, access adversary management for threat actor and IOC intelligence retrieval automation, retrieve network sensor management for Lumu collector deployment and status monitoring automation, manage comment management for incident investigation note and collaboration automation, handle mute management for false positive incident suppression automation, access operator management for team member and escalation workflow automation, retrieve contact management for notification and alert routing automation, manage stats management for organizational compromise level and trend analytics automation, and integrate Lumu with SIEM, SOAR, PSA, and ticketing platforms for compromise assessment automation.

Evaluated Mar 07, 2026 (0d ago) vcurrent
Homepage ↗ Other lumu cybersecurity compromise-assessment DNS-security network-detection threat-intelligence
⚙ Agent Friendliness
58
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
72
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
68
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
10
Documentation
76
Error Messages
70
Auth Simplicity
80
Rate Limits
68

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
99
Auth Strength
66
Scope Granularity
58
Dep. Hygiene
68
Secret Handling
68

DNS compromise assessment. SOC2. API key. US. Network DNS metadata and adversary contact data.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
64
Version Stability
72
Breaking Changes
66
Error Recovery
68
AF Security Reliability

Best When

A security operations team or MSP wanting AI agents to retrieve network compromise incidents, assess organizational compromise levels, and integrate DNS-based threat detections with SIEM and response platforms through Lumu's continuous compromise assessment platform.

Avoid When

COLLECTOR DEPLOYMENT IS REQUIRED: Lumu requires network collectors (DNS forwarders or traffic analysis) deployed in the environment; automated cloud-native assumption creates no_data for organizations without Lumu collectors capturing DNS metadata; automated must deploy Lumu collectors before receiving compromise data. LUMU MEASURES COMPROMISE AFTER THE FACT: Lumu detects existing network compromise through DNS contact with adversary infrastructure; automated prevention assumption creates capability_mismatch for teams expecting Lumu to block threats rather than detect existing compromise; automated must understand Lumu is detection/measurement, not prevention. FREE TIER HAS LIMITED FEATURES: Lumu Freemium has limited incident history and no API access; automated full-API assumption creates plan_required for teams expecting API access on free tier; automated must upgrade to paid plan for API automation. DNS-BASED DETECTION HAS BLIND SPOTS: Lumu analyzes DNS queries for adversary contact; automated comprehensive-detection assumption creates detection_gap for threats that don't generate DNS queries (encrypted DNS, direct IP connections); automated must supplement with additional detection layers.

Use Cases

  • Retrieving network compromise incidents for automated SIEM correlation and SOAR response automation agents
  • Assessing organizational compromise level for security posture reporting automation agents
  • Integrating Lumu threat detections with PSA ticketing for MSP security operations automation agents
  • Monitoring DNS-based adversary contact for continuous compromise detection automation agents

Not For

  • Endpoint detection and response (Lumu is network/DNS-based compromise assessment; CrowdStrike and SentinelOne serve endpoint EDR)
  • Web application firewall and perimeter protection (Lumu analyzes DNS metadata for network compromise, not application layer attacks)
  • Email security and phishing detection (Lumu focuses on network compromise; Proofpoint and Mimecast serve email threat detection)

Interface

REST API
Yes
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
Yes

Authentication

Methods: apikey
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Lumu uses API key for Compromise Assessment REST API. REST API with JSON. Miami, FL HQ (Colombian founders). Founded 2019 by Ricardo Villadiego. Raised $30M+. Products: Lumu Free, Lumu Defense, Lumu Defense Pro. Uses DNS metadata analysis for continuous compromise measurement. 2,000+ organizations monitored. Industries: SMB, enterprise, MSP. Gartner Cool Vendor 2021. Competes with Infoblox, Cisco Umbrella, and DNS Filter for DNS-based network security.

Pricing

Model: freemium
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

Miami FL. $30M raised. Free tier available (limited). Paid plans for full API access. 2,000+ organizations.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
cursor
Idempotent
Partial
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • API KEY IS COMPANY-LEVEL: Lumu API keys are scoped to the company account; automated user-key assumption creates scope_mismatch for multi-company MSP implementations requiring per-company API keys; automated MSP implementations must use separate API key per managed company
  • INCIDENTS HAVE INVESTIGATION STATUS LIFECYCLE: Lumu incidents progress through open → muted → confirmed states; automated binary-open-closed assumption creates workflow_mismatch for incident management not accounting for Lumu's mute/confirm investigation workflow; automated must implement Lumu's investigation status workflow
  • PAGINATION USES CURSOR-BASED MODEL: Lumu API uses cursor-based pagination for incident listing; automated page-number assumption creates duplicate_incidents for pagination implementations using page numbers instead of Lumu's cursor tokens; automated must use cursor tokens from previous response for pagination
  • WEBHOOKS DELIVER REAL-TIME INCIDENTS: Lumu webhooks deliver real-time incident notifications; automated polling-only assumption creates delayed_response for security workflows requiring real-time incident response; automated should implement webhook endpoint for real-time incident processing
  • COLLECTOR HEALTH IS NOT API-ACCESSIBLE: Lumu collector deployment health is monitored via Lumu portal; automated api-health assumption creates monitoring_gap for collector health checks attempted via API; automated must use Lumu portal for collector health monitoring or rely on absence of data as health indicator

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for Lumu Cybersecurity Compromise Assessment REST API.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-07.

6470
Packages Evaluated
26150
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered