maas-mcp-server

maas-mcp-server is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes MAAS (Metal as a Service) functionality as MCP JSON-RPC tools. It supports discovery of dynamically generated tools based on MAAS API documentation and can run via stdio (stdin/stdout) or an HTTP endpoint.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (16d ago)
Repo ↗ Infrastructure mcp model-context-protocol json-rpc-2.0 maas infrastructure-automation devtools golang
⚙ Agent Friendliness
68
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
48
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
40
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
78
Documentation
72
Error Messages
--
Auth Simplicity
55
Rate Limits
55

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
60
Auth Strength
40
Scope Granularity
35
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
55

README indicates MAAS_API_KEY is required in the format consumer:token:secret and suggests config/env-based setup. It also mentions an AUTH_ENABLED flag defaulting to false, which may expose the MCP server without access control if misconfigured. TLS usage details for the HTTP mode are not explicitly documented in the provided README content. No evidence of fine-grained authorization scopes at the MCP layer is described.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
60
Breaking Changes
55
Error Recovery
45
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You already operate MAAS and want to manage it via MCP-compatible agents, preferring stdio/agent integration or a local HTTP endpoint.

Avoid When

You require fine-grained authorization/role enforcement at the MCP layer, or you cannot control/secure the MAAS API credentials used by the server.

Use Cases

  • Automating MAAS operations (list machines, get details, power control) through an AI assistant using MCP tools
  • Building chat/agent workflows for infrastructure provisioning and lifecycle management in MAAS
  • Integrating MAAS management into orchestration tools that support MCP over stdio

Not For

  • Public multi-tenant exposure without strong network/auth controls
  • Use as a generic MAAS client for arbitrary scripting beyond the documented tool surface
  • Use where you need first-class SDKs or a stable, fixed API contract without dynamic tool generation changes

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: MAAS API key (consumer:token:secret) configured via MAAS_API_KEY Optional MCP server auth toggle via AUTH_ENABLED (as described in README)
OAuth: No Scopes: No

The README states AUTH_ENABLED defaults to false, and MAAS authentication uses an API key format. No OAuth flows or explicit fine-grained scopes are described for the MCP layer.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Open-source (MIT) project; runtime costs depend on your MAAS deployment and hosting environment.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
Uses MAAS-backed pagination concepts; tool schemas include parameters like limit/page for listing tools, but the README only describes this generally.
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • AUTH_ENABLED default is false per README example; agents deployed in shared networks should ensure MCP access is secured.
  • Tools are dynamically generated from MAAS API docs, so tool availability/parameters may change when MAAS API changes or tool generation logic is updated.
  • Some methods are operational (e.g., power control) and may be non-idempotent; agents should avoid blind retries on failures.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for maas-mcp-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered