lime

Lime is a local-first desktop AI agent workbench (built with Tauri) that organizes workspaces, tasks/sessions, reusable Skills workflows, and integrations for external tools/services via MCP. It also supports asynchronous collaboration through channels (e.g., Feishu/Telegram/Discord) via a “Claw” concept, and produces persistent artifacts (documents/scripts/visual plans/video plans) as results.

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (0d ago)
Repo ↗ DevTools ai agent agentic-ai desktop tauri mcp skills local-first collaboration artifacts
⚙ Agent Friendliness
27
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
54
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
25
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
40
Documentation
45
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
60
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
80
Auth Strength
55
Scope Granularity
30
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
50

README indicates provider/credential management (API keys and OAuth) within the app, but does not describe secure storage, redaction, or token handling practices. License is GPLv3. No server-side API security controls, TLS requirements, or scope granularity are documented in the provided content.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
40
Breaking Changes
40
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want an on-device/desktop agent workspace that persists projects, workflows (Skills), and outputs (artifacts), with extensibility through MCP-based tools.

Avoid When

You need a well-documented network API with OpenAPI specs, server-side webhooks, and clearly defined rate limits for agent automation.

Use Cases

  • Local-first AI-assisted content creation (articles, scripts, long-form writing)
  • Idea-to-delivery pipelines using reusable prompt/workflow Skills
  • Browser/file/terminal-assisted agent workflows via MCP tools
  • Iterative task sessions with persisted context, versions, and artifacts
  • Channel-based asynchronous collaboration triggering and returning results

Not For

  • A simple hosted API service (it is a desktop application, not a backend API)
  • Use cases requiring documented public REST/GraphQL/SDK interfaces for programmatic access
  • Teams needing clear published SLAs/uptime guarantees for availability

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: API Key management (for providers/services within the app) OAuth credential management (as described via provider/credential UI)
OAuth: Yes Scopes: No

README describes a UI for managing API keys, OAuth credentials, and provider connections, but does not document specific auth flows, scopes, or token lifecycles for external programmatic use.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No pricing information in provided README/manifest content. Repository license is GPLv3; runtime provider/model costs likely depend on third-party providers configured in the app.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • This appears to be a desktop application; public machine-to-machine interfaces (REST/webhooks/SDK/OpenAPI) are not evidenced in provided content.
  • Auth and rate limiting are not documented for agent automation in the README content provided.
  • Idempotency, retries, and error semantics for agent tool calls are not specified in the provided materials.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for lime.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

6390
Packages Evaluated
20013
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered