AskUserQuestionPlus

AskUserQuestionPlus is an MCP server (Streamable HTTP) that opens a web-based questionnaire UI and returns user-selected answers back to an LLM/tool call via the MCP tool `ask_user_question_plus`.

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (21d ago)
Repo ↗ DevTools mcp model-context-protocol ai-ml devtools forms websocket express ui interactive
⚙ Agent Friendliness
50
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
27
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
31
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
72
Documentation
80
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
20
Rate Limits
20

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
35
Auth Strength
15
Scope Granularity
10
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
30

No authentication/authorization is described. TLS requirement and CSRF/session security are not documented. The service uses dependencies like `express`, `ws`, `open`, `zod`, and `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk`; dependency hygiene is unknown from the provided content. Treat it as potentially exposing interactive user data unless deployed with network restrictions and additional safeguards.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
50
Breaking Changes
40
Error Recovery
35
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want lightweight, local or internal-tool style interactive questionnaires driven by an LLM, and you can run the server behind trusted network boundaries.

Avoid When

You need robust security controls (authz, audit logging, CSRF protection guarantees) or multi-tenant exposure without deploying additional safeguards.

Use Cases

  • Collect structured user input from an LLM conversation (e.g., preferences, triage questions, onboarding surveys).
  • Use with Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI workflows via MCP over HTTP.
  • Interactive multi-question forms with single/multiple choice and an optional free-text “Other” input.

Not For

  • Production scenarios that require strict authentication/authorization controls for interactive user data without additional hardening.
  • Use cases needing programmatic REST endpoints (non-MCP) for fully automated, headless submission.
  • Environments where automatic browser interaction is disallowed or undesirable.

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: None documented (public server assumed in README)
OAuth: No Scopes: No

The README does not describe authentication, authorization, or signed sessions for the MCP server; it only documents startup parameters and tool schemas.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No pricing information provided (appears to be an open-source npm package).

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Authentication/security expectations are not documented; agents should assume the server is trusted unless you add protections.
  • Automatic browser tab opening/closure is described; headless or locked-down environments may not work as expected.
  • Timeout behavior exists (default 10 minutes) but retry semantics and partial completion handling are not documented.
  • The tool schema is provided, but exact MCP method names, transport details, and error codes are not shown in the README excerpts, so agent-side handling may require experimentation.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for AskUserQuestionPlus.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered