Jira MCP Server (Atlassian)

Official Atlassian MCP server providing agent-native tools for searching, creating, and updating Jira issues and projects — enabling agents to interact with Jira Cloud without constructing raw REST calls or managing JQL queries manually.

Evaluated Mar 06, 2026 (0d ago) vcurrent
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Developer Tools jira project-management issue-tracking mcp atlassian
⚙ Agent Friendliness
79
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
85
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
85
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
79
Documentation
82
Error Messages
78
Auth Simplicity
76
Rate Limits
80

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
100
Auth Strength
82
Scope Granularity
80
Dep. Hygiene
82
Secret Handling
82

OAuth 2.0 with fine-grained read/write scopes for Jira data. API tokens are user-scoped and can be revoked individually. SOC2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified. FedRAMP authorization in progress. Data residency options for EU and AU.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
88
Version Stability
85
Breaking Changes
82
Error Recovery
85
AF Security Reliability

Best When

An agent needs to read, create, and update Jira issues and manage sprint workflows as part of development lifecycle automation in a Jira Cloud environment.

Avoid When

The task requires deep administrative configuration of Jira workflows, permission schemes, or custom field schemas — these are outside the MCP server's scope.

Use Cases

  • Search issues using JQL to find bugs, tasks, or stories matching specific criteria for triage workflows
  • Create and update tickets programmatically as part of automated development or incident management pipelines
  • Manage sprint contents and transition issue statuses to drive agile workflow automation
  • Link related issues and epics to maintain project graph structure from agent-generated insights
  • Query project boards and backlogs to generate sprint planning summaries or velocity reports

Not For

  • Full project administration — complex workflow, permission scheme, or field configuration changes are not exposed via the MCP tools
  • Complex custom workflow automation requiring Jira Automation rules or ScriptRunner — use those tools directly
  • Bulk data migrations — the MCP interface is not optimized for high-volume import/export operations

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: api_token oauth2
OAuth: Yes Scopes: Yes

Jira Cloud requires Atlassian API token (email + token basic auth) or OAuth 2.0 (3LO). Basic auth with password is deprecated — must use API token. OAuth 2.0 supports fine-grained scopes for read:jira-work and write:jira-work. Server/Data Center uses different auth mechanisms.

Pricing

Model: paid
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

MCP server itself is open source. Jira Cloud subscription required for API access. API access is included with all Jira plans including Free.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
offset
Idempotent
Partial
Retry Guidance
Documented

Known Gotchas

  • JQL (Jira Query Language) syntax must be learned — even small syntax errors return 400 errors with sometimes cryptic messages
  • Issue key (PROJECT-123), issue ID (numeric), and internal UUID are three different identifiers used in different contexts — mixing them causes confusing 404s
  • Status transitions require the transition ID (numeric), not the transition name — agents must first fetch available transitions for an issue before transitioning
  • Custom fields have project-specific IDs (customfield_10001 etc.) that differ between Jira instances — field IDs are not portable
  • Basic auth with password is deprecated — must use API token with email as username; using the account password directly no longer works
  • Jira Cloud and Jira Server/Data Center have meaningfully different API surfaces — MCP server targets Cloud only

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Detailed scoring breakdown, competitive positioning, security analysis, and improvement recommendations for Jira MCP Server (Atlassian).

$99

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-06.

5220
Packages Evaluated
26151
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered