Jasmine

Behavior-driven development (BDD) testing framework for JavaScript with zero dependencies and no DOM requirement. Provides describe/it/expect syntax with a rich built-in matcher library and spy/mock system. Works in both Node.js and browsers without configuration. One of the oldest and most established JavaScript test frameworks.

Evaluated Mar 06, 2026 (0d ago) v5.x
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Developer Tools testing bdd javascript browser node.js spec matcher spy
⚙ Agent Friendliness
68
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
98
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
88
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
--
Documentation
85
Error Messages
82
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
100

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
100
Auth Strength
100
Scope Granularity
100
Dep. Hygiene
88
Secret Handling
100

Testing framework with no runtime dependencies. No network calls. Zero external dependencies in core package.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
100
Version Stability
85
Breaking Changes
78
Error Recovery
90
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You're working on an Angular project (default framework), maintaining legacy test suites, or need a zero-dependency browser-compatible test framework.

Avoid When

Starting a new project — Jest or Vitest offer better tooling, TypeScript support, and ecosystem integration for greenfield work.

Use Cases

  • Write BDD-style unit tests for JavaScript/TypeScript agent modules with describe/it/expect syntax
  • Test browser-compatible JavaScript code in both Node.js and browser environments with the same test files
  • Mock dependencies in agent unit tests using Jasmine's built-in spy system (spyOn, createSpy, createSpyObj)
  • Test Angular applications where Jasmine is the default framework (via Angular CLI and Karma)
  • Write self-contained tests with zero external dependencies for lightweight CI environments

Not For

  • Modern TypeScript-first projects — Jest or Vitest offer better TypeScript integration, snapshot testing, and faster parallel execution
  • Projects already using Jest — Jasmine's API is similar but not identical; migration friction is high
  • High-performance test suites with hundreds of test files — Jest's parallel worker model is faster at scale

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
Yes
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: none
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Local testing framework — no authentication required.

Pricing

Model: open_source
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

MIT license. One of the foundational JavaScript testing frameworks, maintained by Pivotal Labs team.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
Full
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Jasmine runs tests serially in a single thread — no parallel execution; large test suites are slower than Jest's parallel worker model
  • Async tests require returning a Promise or calling done() callback — forgetting done() or not returning a Promise silently passes tests without running assertions
  • Jasmine's spy system (spyOn) modifies objects in-place — must call jasmine.clock().uninstall() and restore spies in afterEach or tests leak state
  • No built-in code coverage — requires Istanbul/nyc integration separately; Jest includes coverage out of the box
  • jasmine.DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL is 5000ms — async tests that take longer silently fail; increase per-spec or globally for slow I/O operations
  • Jasmine 4.x/5.x introduced breaking changes to custom matchers — the matchersUtil API changed; verify compatibility when upgrading from Jasmine 3.x

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Detailed scoring breakdown, competitive positioning, security analysis, and improvement recommendations for Jasmine.

$99

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-06.

5215
Packages Evaluated
26151
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered