shiny-server-arm

Shiny Server packaged/configured for ARM platforms (arm64/armhf) to host R Shiny web applications, typically via an installable server distribution plus supporting configuration and system integration.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (25d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Infrastructure shiny r web-apps deployment arm arm64 server
⚙ Agent Friendliness
17
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
45
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
30
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
0
Documentation
25
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
50
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
60
Auth Strength
40
Scope Granularity
20
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
55

Security posture depends on deployment configuration (TLS termination, reverse proxy settings, OS hardening, and any authentication integration). No specific security guarantees can be inferred from the package name alone.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
45
Breaking Changes
40
Error Recovery
35
AF Security Reliability

Use Cases

  • Self-hosting R Shiny apps on ARM-based devices/servers
  • Deploying internal dashboards and interactive analytics without relying on a separate managed platform
  • Running Shiny applications in edge/IoT-like environments where x86_64 hosting is unavailable

Not For

  • Hosting non-Shiny applications
  • Use cases requiring a first-class developer API/SDK interface for programmatic application management
  • Environments needing strong built-in enterprise auth integration out of the box (not indicated)

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

Shiny Server deployments often rely on web server / OS-level controls and optional configuration for authentication, but no specific auth methods are evidenced from the provided package name alone.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • This package is primarily a server distribution/build artifact, not a tool with a stable programmatic API surface.
  • If automated install/configuration is attempted, ARM-specific dependencies/paths and service-management differences can cause failures that look like generic install errors.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for shiny-server-arm.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered