xiaozhi_mcp_server_golang

A Go-based MCP server that connects to the “xiaozhi” service via a WebSocket connection.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (16d ago)
Repo ↗ DevTools mcp golang websocket agent-integration gateway
⚙ Agent Friendliness
26
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
18
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
12
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
35
Documentation
20
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
40
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
30
Auth Strength
20
Scope Granularity
0
Dep. Hygiene
20
Secret Handling
20

Only minimal metadata/README text is available (no security/auth documentation). Assume security posture is unknown; WebSocket usage implies transport-level protections (TLS/wss) and authentication controls should be explicitly verified in the code before production use.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
30
Breaking Changes
0
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Use Cases

  • Integrating the xiaozhi backend with an MCP-capable agent workflow
  • Providing agent-accessible tools/actions backed by xiaozhi over MCP transport
  • Prototyping an MCP gateway using Go and WebSocket transport

Not For

  • Production deployments where security, auth, and error-handling details are not documented
  • Use cases requiring a REST/GraphQL/OpenAPI contract or official SDKs
  • Environments needing clearly documented rate limits, pagination, and retry/idempotency guarantees

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • README provides no details about MCP tool schemas, transport configuration, or failure modes; an agent may have difficulty discovering capabilities or handling connection drops.
  • No documented retry/idempotency guidance for MCP calls over WebSocket.
  • No documented rate-limit behavior or headers; agents may overload the upstream if they aggressively retry.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for xiaozhi_mcp_server_golang.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered