pinme

PinMe is a zero-config CLI tool that uploads/export static frontend content to an IPFS-based publishing system, producing preview URLs and optionally binding content to a domain (PinMe subdomains and custom DNS) using an AppKey/VIP membership.

Evaluated Mar 29, 2026 (22d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Infrastructure devtools cli ipfs static-site deployment frontend car-import-export verifiable-content
⚙ Agent Friendliness
42
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
49
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
22
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
0
Documentation
72
Error Messages
--
Auth Simplicity
60
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
60
Auth Strength
55
Scope Granularity
10
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
65

Uses AppKey-based authentication (not OAuth) and indicates masked display plus logout clearing local storage, suggesting some care for secrets. Scope/granularity is not described. No explicit TLS/auth transport details, rate limiting, or secure storage mechanism (e.g., keychain) are provided. Dependency list is reasonably standard for CLI tooling, but without audit/CVE information scores are approximate.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
50
Breaking Changes
0
Error Recovery
40
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You have a static frontend build artifact (dist/build/out/public) and want quick, verifiable IPFS-based hosting with optional domain binding.

Avoid When

You need first-class REST/SDK integrations, fine-grained programmatic domain/app management, or guaranteed IPFS-network-wide deletion semantics.

Use Cases

  • Deploy static frontend builds (Vite/React/Vue/Next static export) with a single command
  • Create verifiable, content-addressed previews for frontends
  • Import/export IPFS content via CAR files for backup/migration
  • Bind uploaded content to a custom domain (DNS) or PinMe subdomain (VIP feature)

Not For

  • Server-side applications requiring a backend runtime
  • Projects that cannot build to a static site (no index.html / missing static assets)
  • Use cases requiring complex API integrations beyond a CLI workflow

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: AppKey via pinme set-appkey Login/logout via local storage VIP membership for domain binding (authorization gating)
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Authentication is via an AppKey stored locally; domain binding requires VIP membership and valid AppKey. No OAuth described.

Pricing

Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

No explicit pricing amounts or payment method details in provided content; subscription features indicated as VIP/Plus.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • CLI is designed around interactive prompts when arguments are missing; agents should always pass explicit paths/CIDs to avoid prompt-driven flows.
  • Router mode constraint: deployed sites may require hash routing; history-mode sites can 404 on sub-routes.
  • Domain binding requires VIP and AppKey; agents that attempt binding without auth may fail.
  • Avoid uploading prohibited paths/files (node_modules, .env, .git, src, config files); ensure build output contains index.html and static assets.
  • Export is asynchronous and uses polling every 5 seconds; long-running operations may need timeout handling in automation.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for pinme.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-29.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered