image-gen-server

⚠ Stale — 112d ago

Provides an MCP server (via fastmcp) that takes text prompts (intended for Cursor IDE integration) and calls an upstream image generation service (即梦AI) to generate images. It supports downloading/saving generated images to a specified folder (including configurable width/height and sampling strength) and generates multiple images per request.

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (112d ago)
Repo ↗ Ai Ml mcp image-generation cursor-integration python fastmcp local-server
⚙ Agent Friendliness
43
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
36
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
29
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
70
Documentation
55
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
25
Rate Limits
10

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
70
Auth Strength
35
Scope Granularity
20
Dep. Hygiene
50
Secret Handling
10

Security posture is partially dependent on upstream communication and how proxy/jimeng is implemented (not included here). The README instructs embedding a session_id (JIMENG_API_TOKEN) directly into server.py, which is risky for secret exposure and accidental commits/logging. Filesystem write location is configurable via save_folder, implying potential path/traversal risks if not validated. No rate-limit, audit logging, or operational hardening details are provided.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
40
Breaking Changes
30
Error Recovery
45
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want local, agent-driven image generation tightly integrated with Cursor via MCP and are comfortable running a local Python process that holds an upstream session token.

Avoid When

You need strict compliance controls, centralized auth management, or you cannot trust local execution/logging/outputs involving third-party session tokens and generated files.

Use Cases

  • Generate product or brand images from text prompts inside Cursor
  • Create website/banner imagery from textual descriptions
  • Automate image generation and local saving for quick iteration during development
  • Use an MCP-enabled agent workflow to request and retrieve image outputs

Not For

  • Production-grade deployments that require robust operational controls and documented SLAs
  • Use cases needing a public, stable REST/SDK API surface for external clients
  • Environments that cannot handle storing or supplying third-party API session tokens
  • High-security environments without hardening of token handling, filesystem access, and logging

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: Static upstream session token (JIMENG_API_TOKEN) configured in server.py
OAuth: No Scopes: No

The README indicates the upstream credential is a session_id cookie value placed directly into server.py as JIMENG_API_TOKEN (with support for multiple tokens). No OAuth flow or per-scope auth is described.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Pricing is not described for this MCP server itself; it likely incurs upstream image-generation service costs based on 即梦AI usage.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Windows path/escaping issues are explicitly called out (slashes, path containing Chinese characters).
  • Cursor integration may show transient states (e.g., 'No tools found') if the server fails to start correctly.
  • The MCP server black window may remain running; the README notes the pop-up/terminal behavior is not resolved.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for image-gen-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
9228
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered