ESLint

The dominant JavaScript/TypeScript static analysis and linting tool. ESLint identifies code issues — potential bugs, style violations, deprecated patterns, security anti-patterns — using configurable rules and a rich plugin ecosystem. Most rules are auto-fixable. Supports TypeScript via @typescript-eslint, React via eslint-plugin-react, and hundreds of community plugins for frameworks and security.

Evaluated Mar 06, 2026 (0d ago) v9.x
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Developer Tools linting javascript typescript code-quality static-analysis rules fixable plugins
⚙ Agent Friendliness
69
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
95
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
86
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
--
Documentation
88
Error Messages
85
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
100

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
100
Auth Strength
100
Scope Granularity
100
Dep. Hygiene
85
Secret Handling
88

Local analysis tool. Security plugins (eslint-plugin-security, eslint-plugin-no-secrets) add security-focused rules. ESLint itself has no external calls or data exfiltration risk.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
100
Version Stability
82
Breaking Changes
75
Error Recovery
85
AF Security Reliability

Best When

Any JavaScript or TypeScript project needing code quality enforcement, consistent coding standards, and security anti-pattern detection.

Avoid When

You've switched to Biome (which replaces ESLint + Prettier with faster Rust implementation) — don't run both unless migrating.

Use Cases

  • Enforce code quality standards across agent codebases — catch undefined variables, unused imports, and potential runtime errors before CI
  • Configure TypeScript type-aware linting rules via @typescript-eslint for type-safety enforcement beyond TypeScript's own compiler checks
  • Add security-focused ESLint rules (eslint-plugin-security, no-eval, no-unsafe-regex) to agent code review pipelines
  • Auto-fix formatting and style issues in CI pipelines using eslint --fix to maintain consistent code style across agent repositories
  • Create custom ESLint rules for project-specific patterns — enforce agent API usage conventions, warn on forbidden dependencies

Not For

  • Code formatting — use Prettier alongside ESLint (not instead of); ESLint handles code quality, Prettier handles formatting
  • TypeScript type checking — ESLint doesn't replace tsc; run both eslint and tsc --noEmit for complete coverage
  • Python, Rust, or other non-JavaScript languages — ESLint is JS/TS only; use language-specific linters

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
Yes
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: none
OAuth: No Scopes: No

No authentication — local development tool.

Pricing

Model: open_source
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

ESLint is open source and free.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
Full
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • ESLint 9.x uses a new flat config format (eslint.config.js) that replaces .eslintrc — existing .eslintrc configs must be migrated; the two systems are not compatible simultaneously
  • @typescript-eslint type-aware rules require parserOptions.project pointing to tsconfig.json — without this, type-aware rules throw 'must be included in at least one of the projects'
  • Type-aware linting is 10-100x slower than syntax-only linting — separate fast (no type-check) and slow (type-aware) lint scripts for pre-commit vs CI
  • ESLint plugin version compatibility with ESLint core — @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin@8.x requires eslint@9; check plugin peer dependency compatibility before upgrading
  • eslint --fix modifies files in place — run in CI with --fix-dry-run or --fix combined with git diff check to fail on unfixed issues without file modification
  • Parser errors from JSX/TSX files require @typescript-eslint/parser — without it, ESLint fails to parse JSX syntax even with jsx: 'react' in tsconfig

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Detailed scoring breakdown, competitive positioning, security analysis, and improvement recommendations for ESLint.

$99

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-06.

5215
Packages Evaluated
26151
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered