skills

A monorepo of reusable, self-contained “skills” intended for use with Codex/Claude-style agents. The README lists multiple skills including: detecting which biomedical claims in Markdown need citations (cite-them-all), generating structured medical lecture materials including references (academic-lectures), processing Gmail invoice emails into structured summaries (gmail-invoice-processor), and converting Markdown into Xiaohongshu (RedNote) image card assets while preserving structure and local images (md-to-xhs-cards).

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (22d ago)
Repo ↗ DevTools devtools ai-agent automation markdown gmail xiaohongshu content-generation templates
⚙ Agent Friendliness
23
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
31
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
25
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
0
Documentation
25
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
50
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
50
Auth Strength
20
Scope Granularity
20
Dep. Hygiene
40
Secret Handling
30

No security guidance is present in the provided README (e.g., how to store secrets, whether TLS is enforced, or how Gmail/XHS authentication is handled). Because it’s a code repository with potential API integrations, the actual security posture depends on per-skill implementation details not included here.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
40
Breaking Changes
40
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want modular, agent-oriented building blocks you can clone and run locally (or integrate into your own agent runner), customizing each skill’s scripts/templates as needed.

Avoid When

You need a stable, versioned public REST/GraphQL API with guaranteed SLAs; or you cannot handle authentication/permissions setup for Gmail/XHS-related functionality.

Use Cases

  • Agent-assisted conversion of Markdown content into Xiaohongshu-ready image cards
  • Turning draft Markdown manuscripts into citation-aware drafts using biomedical sources
  • Generating structured medical lecture decks and accompanying materials (outlines, references, notes)
  • Automating extraction/summarization of invoice details from Gmail emails
  • Reusable prompt/skill modules for multi-step content automation workflows

Not For

  • A managed SaaS API to call over the network (this appears to be a code repository of skills)
  • Production-grade, guaranteed-compliance medical publishing without human review
  • Direct XHS/Gmail operation without proper OAuth/service setup and user consent
  • Use as a single unified interface (multiple independent skills are spread across subfolders)

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: Not specified in provided README (likely depends on individual skills/scripts)
OAuth: No Scopes: No

The top-level README does not describe authentication mechanisms. Given the presence of a Gmail-related skill, OAuth/service credentials are likely required within that skill, but this is not verifiable from the provided content.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No pricing information is provided; repository appears to be MIT-licensed code intended for local use.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Top-level README only enumerates skills; deeper per-skill behavior, inputs/outputs, and operational semantics are not shown in the provided content.
  • Authentication, rate limiting, and failure modes for Gmail/XHS-related automation are not documented in the provided README.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for skills.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered