local-mcp-gateway

Local MCP Gateway is a self-hosted control-plane/proxy that aggregates multiple MCP servers behind profile-specific HTTP endpoints, with a web UI for managing MCP servers, profiles, tools, logging/observability, and access control (API keys and OAuth 2.1).

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (21d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ API Gateway mcp api-gateway oauth2 local-first observability profiles docker typescript
⚙ Agent Friendliness
44
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
59
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
21
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
70
Documentation
60
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
45
Rate Limits
10

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
70
Auth Strength
75
Scope Granularity
45
Dep. Hygiene
50
Secret Handling
50

README claims OAuth 2.1 support (PKCE, DCR) and API key management, plus organization/team RBAC. However, provided materials do not specify scope granularity, token lifetimes, rotation, CSRF protections, secure session storage, or whether the HTTP endpoints enforce HTTPS. Docker/local usage suggests transport is typically local, but TLS requirements for production are not described. Dependency hygiene and secret handling practices are not evidenced in the provided content.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
35
Breaking Changes
30
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want to self-host an MCP aggregation/gateway locally (often with Docker) and manage which tools are available to different clients/assistants.

Avoid When

You cannot support user authentication flows (signup/OAuth) or prefer a simple unauthenticated pass-through proxy.

Use Cases

  • Expose a curated subset of MCP tools to different AI assistants via profiles
  • Aggregate multiple MCP servers (stdio/SSE/remote) behind a single gateway endpoint
  • Team/shared management of MCP servers and profiles with role-based access control
  • Debug/inspect MCP request/response traffic through an observability UI

Not For

  • Publicly hosted, internet-facing services without additional hardening/ops controls
  • Environments requiring a strict, documented API contract for every gateway behavior without UI-based configuration
  • Use as a lightweight library/SDK for embedding into another backend

Interface

REST API
Yes
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: Email/password signup (per README: sign up with email and password) Google OAuth (per README: 'User Authentication (email/password, Google OAuth)') API key management (per README: 'Built-in API Key management') OAuth 2.1 (PKCE, DCR) (per README)
OAuth: Yes Scopes: No

Auth is described at a feature level (OAuth 2.1, API key management, team RBAC), but the README provided does not include concrete auth flows, endpoints, scope model, or exact token usage for the MCP endpoints.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Self-hosted. README indicates Elastic License 2.0 and 'cannot be provided as a hosted service to third parties,' which affects commercial hosting/licensing decisions.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Requires authentication/signup and likely token/API-key setup before tool usage (details not provided in README).
  • Profile selection is dynamic via different MCP endpoint URLs; agents must use the correct profile path (e.g., /api/mcp/{profile}).
  • If used with Claude Desktop, HTTPS tunneling may be required to avoid SSL/certificate issues.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for local-mcp-gateway.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered