beyond-mcp

Provides four example integration patterns for accessing Kalshi prediction market data with AI agents: an MCP server wrapper around a CLI, a standalone CLI with JSON/Human output and local caching, progressive-disclosure file-system scripts, and a Claude Code “skill” that reuses those scripts with team sharing via git.

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (21d ago)
Repo ↗ DevTools ai-agents mcp claude-code cli scripts tooling caching python
⚙ Agent Friendliness
52
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
46
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
20
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
55
Documentation
70
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
95
Rate Limits
20

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
90
Auth Strength
20
Scope Granularity
10
Dep. Hygiene
35
Secret Handling
80

Uses HTTPS base URL for Kalshi API and states no auth required for read-only public data. Scope granularity and auth controls are effectively minimal because there is no auth layer here. README does not document rate limits, input validation, logging redaction, or secret handling practices; dependency hygiene cannot be confirmed from provided content. Local caching writes to .kalshi_cache, so consider filesystem permissions and data handling in shared environments.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
35
Breaking Changes
25
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You need agent-accessible market read tools and want to compare/implement patterns that preserve context (scripts/skills) or standardize integration (MCP) while using local caching for search.

Avoid When

You require robust, documented enterprise-grade interfaces (OpenAPI/SDK, guaranteed error semantics, explicit rate-limit/error recovery guarantees) and audit-ready security controls for production traffic.

Use Cases

  • Building agent tools for reading Kalshi market data (read-only)
  • Choosing between MCP vs CLI vs scripts vs Claude Skills based on context/token constraints
  • Keyword search over markets/series using a local cached index
  • Providing tool access for multiple LLM clients (via MCP) or a single ecosystem (via Claude skills)

Not For

  • Performing authenticated/write operations (repo indicates read-only access without authentication)
  • Production-grade, fully specified, turn-key API/SDK consumption without reviewing code quality and error handling
  • Environments requiring formal SLAs or guaranteed uptime characteristics

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

README states no authentication required for read-only public data from Kalshi API. This repo itself likely relies on calling Kalshi public endpoints directly from scripts/CLI/MCP wrapper.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No pricing information for this repo; cost is mainly engineering + runtime for fetching/building local cache (first run).

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • MCP tool calls are stateless per README (each call loses conversational context).
  • MCP wrapper delegates to CLI via subprocess, which may add latency and complicate debugging.
  • Search-first-run cache build can take several minutes; agents/users may see progress while cache is generated.
  • Skill approach is Claude Code specific (not portable to other MCP/agent runtimes).
  • File scripts require local filesystem access and correct tool/script loading for progressive disclosure.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for beyond-mcp.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered