vikunja-mcp

MCP server that exposes Vikunja task/project/workflow functionality as subcommand-style tools, with session-based token/JWT authentication, validation, rate limiting, and retry/circuit-breaking for resilience.

Evaluated Mar 30, 2026 (21d ago)
Repo ↗ Automation mcp vikunja task-management automation typescript productivity ai-tools
⚙ Agent Friendliness
76
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
65
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
54
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
85
Documentation
75
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
65
Rate Limits
70

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
80
Auth Strength
75
Scope Granularity
40
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
70

README claims Zod-based input validation, DoS protection, express-rate-limit rate limiting, and centralized/typed error handling. It also recommends using env vars for configuration. JWT extraction steps increase the chance of token exposure in the operator workflow; the package appears to manage tokens automatically but scope granularity and secret logging behavior are not fully verifiable from the provided content.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
60
Breaking Changes
80
Error Recovery
75
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want an MCP-compatible assistant to operate Vikunja with typed inputs, pagination, and guardrails against abusive requests.

Avoid When

You cannot securely provision/store API tokens/JWTs or you cannot constrain the assistant’s tool use to least-privilege operations.

Use Cases

  • Let AI assistants create, list, update, and delete tasks in a Vikunja instance
  • Automate task workflows (labels, assignees, comments, reminders, relations)
  • Manage projects and teams via MCP tools
  • Bulk import tasks from CSV/JSON with validation and dry-run
  • Export project data or request/download user export

Not For

  • Highly sensitive deployments that require zero exposure of end-user tokens to an external agent runtime
  • Use where you need a fully standard REST/GraphQL/SDK integration surface instead of MCP tools
  • Environments that cannot provide access to the Vikunja instance API endpoint

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
Yes

Authentication

Methods: API token authentication (tk_*) JWT authentication (eyJ* tokens)
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Auth is session-based/automatic token management per README. JWT appears to be user-context capable and expires (likely ~24h); API tokens are more limited (not user-specific endpoints). Scope granularity is not described.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No pricing information for the MCP package itself is provided in the supplied data.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
cursor-less pagination (page/perPage)
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Documented

Known Gotchas

  • JWT token expiry: the assistant/operator may need to refresh/reprovide JWT periodically.
  • Different tool availability/capabilities depending on API token vs JWT (users/export likely JWT-only).
  • Bulk operations may have limits (e.g., bulk create/delete max 100); agents should respect these constraints to avoid failures.
  • Filtering syntax is passed as a string; malformed filters may be rejected by validation/parsing.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for vikunja-mcp.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-30.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered