commitlint

Lints git commit messages against configurable rules. commitlint enforces the Conventional Commits specification (feat, fix, chore, docs, etc.) and other commit message formats via a Git hook (commit-msg). Works with Husky or Lefthook to reject commits that don't follow conventions. Powers the automated release pipeline: commitlint → semantic-release → automated versioning and changelogs.

Evaluated Mar 06, 2026 (0d ago) v19.x
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Developer Tools git commits conventional-commits linting ci automation code-quality husky
⚙ Agent Friendliness
68
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
98
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
91
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
--
Documentation
85
Error Messages
85
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
100

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
100
Auth Strength
100
Scope Granularity
100
Dep. Hygiene
85
Secret Handling
100

Local tool with no network access. Validates text only. Supply chain: npm package, MIT licensed, conventional-changelog org.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
100
Version Stability
88
Breaking Changes
85
Error Recovery
90
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want automated releases via semantic-release, need consistent commit history for changelogs, or have a team that needs to standardize commit message format.

Avoid When

You don't use Conventional Commits or don't need automated versioning — the overhead of commitlint setup isn't worth it without the downstream automation.

Use Cases

  • Enforce Conventional Commits format across a team so that semantic-release can automatically version and changelog releases from commit history
  • Block poorly-formatted commit messages at commit time using Git hook integration (commit-msg hook via Husky or Lefthook)
  • Lint commit messages in CI/CD to catch format violations in pull requests before merging to main branch
  • Configure custom commit scopes and types for monorepos where different packages have different allowed scopes
  • Standardize agent-generated commit messages by validating AI-produced commits against team conventions

Not For

  • Repository-wide code linting — commitlint lints commit messages only; use ESLint/Biome for code
  • Teams not adopting Conventional Commits — commitlint's value is tied to the Conventional Commits convention
  • Solo developers — the overhead of setup is most valuable for teams with multiple contributors

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: none
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Local CLI tool — no authentication. Runs as a Git hook during commit process.

Pricing

Model: open_source
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

commitlint is MIT open source and maintained by the conventional-changelog organization.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
Full
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • commitlint config (commitlint.config.js) must extend a preset like @commitlint/config-conventional — bare config without extending a preset does nothing by default
  • Conventional Commits format is strict: 'type(scope): subject' — the colon and space after type(scope) are required; missing the space causes lint failure
  • In monorepos, allowed scopes must be explicitly configured — by default any scope is accepted; configure scope-enum rule to enforce package names as scopes
  • commitlint runs against the last commit message — in rebase scenarios, all commits being rebased are checked one by one; squash-and-merge workflows reduce this friction
  • Git commit --amend re-triggers the commit-msg hook — fixing a bad message via amend will re-run commitlint on the amended message
  • Node.js version requirements increased in commitlint 18+ — projects on Node 14/16 must stay on commitlint 17.x or upgrade Node

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for commitlint.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-06.

5229
Packages Evaluated
26151
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered