Camelot PDF Table Extractor

Extracts structured tables from PDF files into pandas DataFrames using either lattice mode (ruled lines) or stream mode (whitespace), enabling programmatic access to tabular data embedded in PDFs.

Evaluated Mar 06, 2026 (0d ago) vcurrent
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Developer Tools pdf table-extraction data-parsing open-source python
⚙ Agent Friendliness
64
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
81
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
75
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
--
Documentation
83
Error Messages
78
Auth Simplicity
98
Rate Limits
95

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
85
Auth Strength
80
Scope Granularity
75
Dep. Hygiene
78
Secret Handling
85

Processes files locally with no network calls; Ghostscript dependency has a history of CVEs and should be kept patched

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
72
Version Stability
78
Breaking Changes
75
Error Recovery
76
AF Security Reliability

Best When

Your agent needs to programmatically extract tabular data from machine-generated PDFs with clear ruled lines or consistent column spacing.

Avoid When

PDFs are scanned images without a text layer, contain highly irregular table layouts, or require real-time extraction at high throughput.

Use Cases

  • Extract financial tables from PDF reports so an agent can analyze revenue, cost, or balance sheet data without manual copy-paste
  • Parse government or regulatory PDF documents to retrieve structured datasets for downstream agent reasoning
  • Pull invoice line-item tables from PDF invoices into structured records for automated accounts-payable workflows
  • Batch-process a directory of PDF research papers and extract all numeric data tables for statistical aggregation
  • Convert scanned or machine-generated PDF forms into tabular CSV output that an agent can query with SQL

Not For

  • Scanned image-only PDFs with no embedded text layer — Camelot requires a text layer; use an OCR tool first for image PDFs
  • Extracting non-tabular content such as body text, headers, or images from PDFs — use PyMuPDF or pdfplumber for general text extraction
  • Production-scale distributed PDF processing pipelines — Camelot is a single-process library without built-in concurrency or job queuing

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
Yes
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: none
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Self-hosted Python library; no authentication required

Pricing

Model: open_source
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

MIT licensed open-source library; only costs are compute and Ghostscript system dependency

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
Full
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Ghostscript must be installed as a system dependency; its absence raises a confusing ImportError or FileNotFoundError rather than a clear dependency message
  • Lattice mode silently returns empty tables for PDFs without visible ruling lines; agents must check table.df.empty before trusting results
  • Stream mode accuracy degrades significantly on multi-column layouts where whitespace gaps between columns are inconsistent
  • camelot.read_pdf() is synchronous and blocking; large multi-page PDFs can freeze an agent event loop if called without threading or subprocess isolation
  • The accuracy score in TableList is a heuristic, not a guarantee — a 99% score can still contain incorrectly merged or split cells that require downstream validation

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for Camelot PDF Table Extractor.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-06.

5647
Packages Evaluated
26151
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered