lnd

lnd is an implementation of the Lightning Network node. It runs as a daemon that connects to the Bitcoin network, manages channels with peers, and provides an RPC/REST-like interface (via gRPC/proxy servers) for creating/monitoring payments over the Lightning Network.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (25d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Payments ai-ml infrastructure payments bitcoin lightning networking devtools self-hosted
⚙ Agent Friendliness
42
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
69
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
39
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
0
Documentation
55
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
35
Rate Limits
10

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
85
Auth Strength
75
Scope Granularity
70
Dep. Hygiene
50
Secret Handling
60

Security posture depends heavily on deployment configuration (TLS, macaroon management, filesystem permissions, and wallet/key protection). lnd uses TLS and macaroon authorization for its RPC in typical setups, which is stronger than unauthenticated APIs, but operational mistakes (leaked macaroons, weak key storage) are a primary risk.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
65
Breaking Changes
50
Error Recovery
40
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You can operate and secure a node (network connectivity, wallet/back-end management, backups) and need direct Lightning Network access.

Avoid When

You want a simple hosted API with minimal ops/security responsibility; or you cannot maintain Bitcoin/Lightning infrastructure and monitoring.

Use Cases

  • Running a self-hosted Lightning Network node
  • Sending and receiving Lightning payments
  • Opening/closing and managing payment channels
  • Monitoring channel and payment status
  • Developing Lightning-enabled applications via node RPC

Not For

  • Custody/escrow or turnkey managed payments without operating a node
  • Use cases requiring a public hosted SaaS API with centralized uptime/SLA (lnd is self-hosted software)

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
Yes
MCP Server
No
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: TLS client authentication for RPC (commonly via macaroons + TLS in lnd deployments) macaroon-based authorization for RPC
OAuth: No Scopes: Yes

lnd typically uses macaroon-based permissions for RPC calls along with TLS on the RPC transport; exact configuration depends on deployment mode and enabled interfaces.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Open-source software; operational costs depend on infrastructure and any Bitcoin/on-chain fees.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Statefulness: repeated calls may create duplicates (e.g., payment retries or channel-related actions) unless the method supports safe re-use semantics.
  • Need correct cryptographic configuration (TLS/macaroon) to avoid authorization failures.
  • Network/chain dependencies: failures can be transient due to Bitcoin connectivity or Lightning peer/channel state.
  • Rate limiting/flow control may be implicit (peer/channel/backpressure) rather than clearly documented as HTTP-style limits.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for lnd.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered