Black

The uncompromising Python code formatter. Black reformats Python code to a single, consistent style — no configuration debates. Its opinionated approach eliminates style discussions from code reviews, making it the most widely adopted Python formatter. Black is deterministic (same input always produces same output) and produces a subset of PEP 8 with specific line length, quoting, and whitespace rules. Note: Ruff's formatter is a compatible, faster alternative.

Evaluated Mar 07, 2026 (0d ago) v24.x
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Developer Tools python formatter code-style opinionated pep8 open-source psf
⚙ Agent Friendliness
70
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
90
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
92
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
--
Documentation
92
Error Messages
85
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
98

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
90
Auth Strength
90
Scope Granularity
88
Dep. Hygiene
92
Secret Handling
90

Local-only formatting tool — no network calls. No sensitive data exposure risk.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
95
Version Stability
90
Breaking Changes
88
Error Recovery
95
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want zero-configuration Python formatting that your whole team adopts without debate — Black is the standard that most Python open-source projects use.

Avoid When

You're already using Ruff — switch to 'ruff format' (Black-compatible) rather than running two formatters. Or if you need highly customized formatting styles.

Use Cases

  • Enforce consistent Python code style across agent codebases — run Black in CI to reject non-formatted code
  • Auto-format agent-generated Python code before execution or storage — ensure generated code is clean and readable
  • Eliminate code style discussions in code review by adopting Black as the project-wide standard
  • Format Python code in pre-commit hooks to keep repository history clean and diffs focused on logic changes
  • Integrate Black with editors (VS Code, PyCharm) via extensions for format-on-save in agent development workflows

Not For

  • Teams needing custom formatting rules — Black is opinionated by design; use autopep8 if you need more configuration
  • Non-Python code formatting — Black is Python-only; use Prettier for JS/TS/CSS
  • Projects where Ruff is already in use — Ruff's formatter (ruff format) is Black-compatible and faster; no need for both

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
Yes
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: none
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Local CLI tool — no external auth.

Pricing

Model: open_source
Free tier: Yes
Requires CC: No

MIT-licensed open source maintained by the Python Software Foundation (PSF).

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
Full
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Black reformats magic trailing commas — a trailing comma in a function call or definition forces multi-line formatting; adding/removing trailing commas changes formatting significantly
  • --check mode returns exit code 1 when files need formatting — CI pipelines must distinguish this from actual errors; use exit code logic carefully in agent CI scripts
  • Black's line length default is 88 characters (not PEP 8's 79) — configure other tools (flake8, ruff) to match with max-line-length = 88 to avoid conflicts
  • Black formats strings to double quotes by default — single-quoted strings in existing code become double-quoted on first run; commit the initial formatting as a separate 'style: apply Black' commit
  • Black cannot format f-strings with complex expressions in Python 3.11 and earlier — very complex f-strings may cause Black to leave them unformatted with no warning
  • Running Black and isort together can conflict — use Black's --profile=black isort setting or switch to Ruff which handles both consistently

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for Black.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-07.

6470
Packages Evaluated
26150
Need Evaluation
173
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered