jira-mcp-server

Spring AI MCP server exposing Jira operations as MCP tools (ticket search via JQL, get issue, create/update issue, add comments) backed by Jira REST API using a token-based configuration.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (16d ago)
Repo ↗ Automation jira mcp spring-ai spring-boot webflux issue-tracking ai-tools integration api
⚙ Agent Friendliness
48
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
47
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
20
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
62
Documentation
55
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
55
Rate Limits
20

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
40
Auth Strength
55
Scope Granularity
30
Dep. Hygiene
50
Secret Handling
60

Uses Jira API token and username via configuration. README does not specify MCP server transport security (TLS) or authentication/authorization protecting the MCP endpoint itself. No mention of least-privilege scope granularity, audit logging, or safe handling of secrets beyond using environment/application.properties.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
30
Breaking Changes
30
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want an AI agent to perform straightforward Jira ticket operations through MCP tools and you can configure Jira API access securely.

Avoid When

You cannot supply a Jira API token or cannot guarantee least-privilege access for the token; you need strong documented rate-limit/retry behavior or advanced pagination semantics for large result sets.

Use Cases

  • Ask an AI agent to search Jira issues using JQL
  • Retrieve Jira issue details by key
  • Create new Jira issues from natural-language requests
  • Update existing Jira issues (fields) via agent actions
  • Have an agent add comments to Jira tickets

Not For

  • Handling highly sensitive ticket content without additional access controls/auditing
  • Production use without validating tool schemas, permissions, and error behavior against your Jira instance
  • Use cases requiring complex workflow automation beyond basic CRUD/comment operations (unless extended)

Interface

REST API
Yes
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: Jira API token via jira.api-token Jira basic auth-style configuration using jira.username + jira.api-token
OAuth: No Scopes: No

README indicates 'secure authentication using Jira API tokens' but does not describe whether requests use HTTP basic auth with token, OAuth, or Jira PAT scopes/permissions. No agent auth described for securing the MCP server itself.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No pricing information provided; likely self-hosted open-source/server.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Large JQL searches may require pagination/limits, but README does not document pagination behavior for searchIssues.
  • No documented idempotency guarantees for create/update/comment operations; repeated tool calls could create duplicate issues or duplicate comments.
  • No documented MCP server auth/rate-limit headers/retry guidance for the connector itself.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for jira-mcp-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered