semantic-router

semantic-router is a Python decision/routing layer that selects a route (e.g., intent, task, tool-use path) by embedding the incoming utterance(s) into a vector space and matching them against route utterance embeddings, returning the best-matching Route (or None if no match). It supports multiple encoder backends (e.g., OpenAI, Cohere, Hugging Face, FastEmbed, local/HF+Torch/llama-cpp) and can integrate with vector indexes such as Pinecone and Qdrant; it also advertises multimodal routing via optional vision/multimodal paths.

Evaluated Mar 29, 2026 (0d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Ai Ml ai nlp routing intent embeddings python vector-search llm-agents
⚙ Agent Friendliness
59
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
56
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
31
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
0
Documentation
70
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
85
Rate Limits
20

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
90
Auth Strength
55
Scope Granularity
20
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
60

Library-level secrets are configured via environment variables in the README examples (a positive practice). However, there is no evidence here of fine-grained scope controls or explicit security guidance, and routing relies on third-party embedding/index services where rate limiting, data handling, and logging behavior are governed externally. Dependency list includes network clients (aiohttp, urllib3) and service SDKs; without a vulnerability scan we cannot confirm hygiene.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
45
Breaking Changes
40
Error Recovery
40
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want low-latency, embedding-based routing of user queries to predefined flows, and you can provide (or run) an embedding model backend (cloud or local).

Avoid When

You need a standard HTTP/hosted service interface (REST/GraphQL/gRPC) or strict enterprise governance features are not otherwise handled by your own deployment.

Use Cases

  • Intent routing for LLM chat/agent workflows (e.g., route to support vs sales vs politics vs chitchat)
  • Tool selection / function-calling pre-routing to reduce LLM latency
  • Faster classification before expensive LLM generation
  • Semantic routing with configurable thresholds (route optimization) and dynamic routes (per docs notebooks)
  • Local/offline routing using local embedding models (via optional extras)

Not For

  • High-assurance authorization/authentication decisions
  • Production-grade routing when you cannot tolerate embedding model drift or retraining needs
  • Environments requiring a network-access-only SaaS REST API (this is primarily a local Python library)

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
No
SDK
Yes
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: Environment-variable API keys for encoder backends (e.g., OPENAI_API_KEY, COHERE_API_KEY) as shown in README
OAuth: No Scopes: No

Authentication is delegated to the underlying embedding/index services (OpenAI/Cohere/Pinecone/etc.) and configured via environment variables in the examples; the library itself is an in-process Python SDK, not an auth-protected web service.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

No SaaS pricing described; operational cost is primarily embedding/index usage for cloud encoders or compute for local encoders.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Authentication and network calls depend on the selected encoder backend; misconfigured API keys will fail at runtime.
  • Routing can return None when no route matches (as shown in README), so downstream agents must handle missing route results.
  • Using remote encoders ties behavior/cost to external services and potential latency spikes unless you provision local models.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for semantic-router.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-03-29.

5365
Packages Evaluated
21038
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered