mcp-prompt-server-go

A Go-based MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that runs over stdio and exposes a set of prompt templates as MCP “tools”, including prompt management utilities (e.g., list available prompts, reload prompt definitions) with hot-reload from a local prompts directory.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (17d ago)
Repo ↗ Ai Ml mcp prompt-server stdio go json-rpc tooling hot-reload templates
⚙ Agent Friendliness
64
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
26
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
26
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
78
Documentation
70
Error Messages
--
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
10

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
20
Auth Strength
20
Scope Granularity
0
Dep. Hygiene
45
Secret Handling
50

Transport is stdio (local) rather than TLS/network; TLS enforcement is not applicable but remote exposure is not documented. No authentication/authorization or scope model is described. Secrets handling practices are not documented in the README. Dependency hygiene cannot be verified from provided content; score is based on lack of evidence rather than actual dependency scan results.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
30
Breaking Changes
20
Error Recovery
55
AF Security Reliability

Best When

Used as a local stdio MCP server by MCP-capable clients (e.g., Cursor/Windsurf/Raycast) to quickly integrate prompt templates as tools.

Avoid When

Avoid where you need robust, documented transport-layer security controls beyond stdio, or where you require strict operational guarantees (SLA, documented recovery/retry/idempotency semantics).

Use Cases

  • Local agent/tooling integration to discover and call prompt templates via MCP (tools/call).
  • Building higher-level agent workflows for content generation, summarization, and code assistance using parameterized prompt templates.
  • Development/debugging of prompt sets with live reload and tool discovery (get_prompt_names).
  • Automated generation of structured artifacts (e.g., PRDs, HTML snippets, code review/refactor suggestions) from templates.

Not For

  • Production-grade remote multi-tenant deployments requiring network endpoints, webhooks, or managed authentication/authorization.
  • Use cases needing first-class REST/GraphQL/SDK integrations, or strict enterprise compliance features documented by the project.
  • Use cases requiring documented rate limiting and usage guarantees across concurrent clients.

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: none documented (stdio server assumed local)
OAuth: No Scopes: No

No authentication mechanism is documented in the provided README. Integration appears intended for local usage via stdio.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Repository README does not describe any pricing; as an open-source server it is presumably self-hosted.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • No documented auth/rate limit semantics; agents should avoid assuming network-accessible or multi-tenant behavior.
  • Hot-reload may cause tool catalog changes during long-running sessions; agents should refresh tool discovery (e.g., get_prompt_names) if behavior changes are observed.
  • No documented structured error codes or retry guidance for MCP tool calls; agents should handle generic JSON-RPC/MCP failures robustly.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for mcp-prompt-server-go.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered