go-mcp-server-service

A Go example implementation of a JSON-RPC 2.0 compliant MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for note management. It provides a command-line interface and a service component (intended to run over stdio), with thread-safe in-memory note storage plus example MCP prompts/tools such as adding notes and summarizing notes. Includes an error code table and guidance for running via Claude Desktop MCP server configuration.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (16d ago)
Repo ↗ DevTools mcp json-rpc-2.0 go stdio agent-tools notes local-dev integration
⚙ Agent Friendliness
58
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
17
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
14
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
65
Documentation
70
Error Messages
--
Auth Simplicity
100
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
0
Auth Strength
0
Scope Granularity
0
Dep. Hygiene
45
Secret Handling
50

The README does not describe authentication, authorization, transport security (TLS), or secret handling. Since it runs over stdio locally (per description), TLS/auth may be outside scope, but that also means there is no documented protection against misuse. Dependency hygiene can’t be verified from provided content; score is conservative.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
30
Breaking Changes
0
Error Recovery
25
AF Security Reliability

Best When

Best for local development, prototyping MCP tool/prompt wiring, and experimenting with stdio-based JSON-RPC MCP integration.

Avoid When

Avoid when you need strong authentication/authorization, durable storage, rate-limit guarantees, or enterprise compliance controls that are not described in the README.

Use Cases

  • Integrating note-management capabilities into MCP-capable AI clients (e.g., Claude Desktop)
  • Prototyping agent tool use for CRUD-like operations on lightweight note content
  • Building a local stdio-based MCP server for experimentation/debugging with MCP Inspector

Not For

  • Production-grade note storage or persistence without additional work (no persistence mentioned)
  • Security-sensitive deployments requiring robust authn/authz and audit controls (not described)
  • Systems needing documented SLAs, monitoring, or guaranteed backward compatibility across versions

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

No authentication or authorization mechanism is described. Configuration examples for Claude Desktop show launching a local command without any auth layer.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Open-source example (MIT license per repository metadata); no pricing information provided.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Likely no persistence is described; repeated runs may not retain notes.
  • Running over stdio can complicate debugging/routing if the agent host expects a different transport.
  • No auth/authz, rate-limit, or quota behavior is documented; agents should assume local trust boundaries unless you add protections.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for go-mcp-server-service.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered