mcp-webmvc-server

A Spring Boot sample MCP server that exposes weather-related tools (forecast by lat/long and alerts by US state) via the Spring AI MCP Server WebMVC transport. It can run over HTTP SSE (default) or over STDIO for MCP clients.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (16d ago)
Repo ↗ Ai Ml mcp spring-boot spring-ai webmvc sse stdio tools weather
⚙ Agent Friendliness
56
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
32
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
18
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
70
Documentation
75
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
95
Rate Limits
5

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
60
Auth Strength
20
Scope Granularity
0
Dep. Hygiene
50
Secret Handling
40

README does not describe authentication/authorization or rate limiting for the MCP server. TLS requirements are not discussed; if deployed behind HTTPS, TLS would be handled by the hosting layer. The project likely makes outbound calls to weather.gov (per description), but handling of API keys/secrets and safe logging is not evidenced in the provided content.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
20
Breaking Changes
30
Error Recovery
20
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You want a working reference implementation for an MCP server using Spring AI with either SSE or STDIO transport to expose typed tool callbacks.

Avoid When

You need explicit authentication, fine-grained authorization, and documented rate limits out of the box, or you require an API spec such as OpenAPI for direct REST consumption.

Use Cases

  • Providing MCP tools for weather retrieval in an agent workflow
  • Demonstrating Spring AI MCP Server Boot Starter integration with WebMVC transport
  • Testing MCP client integrations using SSE or STDIO transports
  • Building a template for exposing domain APIs as MCP tools

Not For

  • Production deployments without further hardening (auth, rate limiting, error modeling, input validation, observability)
  • Use as a complete/finished weather data service (it is described as a sample and weather implementation details are not provided here)
  • Use cases requiring strong contractual REST-style APIs beyond the MCP protocol

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

OAuth: No Scopes: No

No authentication/authorization is described for the MCP server itself in the provided README content.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

This appears to be a self-hosted sample project; no pricing model is described.

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • Server runs in two modes (SSE default vs STDIO via JVM properties); clients must match the transport configuration.
  • The README indicates a configurable SSE message endpoint (/mcp/message), so routing/endpoint assumptions may differ by configuration.
  • No explicit guidance is given for tool-level validation errors or how structured MCP errors are returned.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for mcp-webmvc-server.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered