mcp-server-prisma

MCP server that exposes Prisma/ORM operations to an MCP-capable AI agent, enabling the agent to inspect schema and perform database actions through Prisma tooling.

Evaluated Apr 04, 2026 (25d ago)
Homepage ↗ Repo ↗ Databases mcp prisma orm database ai-agents tooling devtools
⚙ Agent Friendliness
40
/ 100
Can an agent use this?
🔒 Security
42
/ 100
Is it safe for agents?
⚡ Reliability
30
/ 100
Does it work consistently?

Score Breakdown

⚙ Agent Friendliness

MCP Quality
55
Documentation
45
Error Messages
0
Auth Simplicity
50
Rate Limits
0

🔒 Security

TLS Enforcement
60
Auth Strength
30
Scope Granularity
20
Dep. Hygiene
55
Secret Handling
50

Security posture depends heavily on deployment choices: DB credential permissions, transport (MCP over TLS depending on host setup), and whether the server constrains tool calls by model/operation. No explicit auth/scopes, audit logging, or rate-limit/abuse controls were provided in the supplied prompt.

⚡ Reliability

Uptime/SLA
0
Version Stability
50
Breaking Changes
30
Error Recovery
40
AF Security Reliability

Best When

You have a Prisma-backed application and want an agent to operate on that domain using Prisma semantics, with controlled permissions and a vetted deployment environment.

Avoid When

When you cannot tightly scope which models/operations the agent can execute (e.g., broad access to write operations across tables).

Use Cases

  • Let an LLM agent read/write data via Prisma without bespoke database tooling
  • Automate CRUD workflows for applications using Prisma models
  • Agent-driven database exploration (e.g., listing models/fields) to answer questions about the data

Not For

  • Untrusted or user-supplied agents/actions without strict authorization and guardrails
  • Direct production data writes without approval, least-privilege, and auditing
  • Use as a generic database proxy when you need strict SQL-level control

Interface

REST API
No
GraphQL
No
gRPC
No
MCP Server
Yes
SDK
No
Webhooks
No

Authentication

Methods: No auth details provided in provided prompt/data; typically relies on MCP host/environment and database credentials configured for the server
OAuth: No Scopes: No

No explicit auth mechanism, scope model, or authorization guidance was provided in the supplied content. If the MCP server is run with a database user/credentials that have write access, the effective authorization may be entirely determined by those DB permissions.

Pricing

Free tier: No
Requires CC: No

Self-hosted open-source style package (no pricing details provided).

Agent Metadata

Pagination
none
Idempotent
False
Retry Guidance
Not documented

Known Gotchas

  • LLMs may generate unsafe or overly broad Prisma queries; enforce tool-level allowlists and model/operation restrictions.
  • Database credentials determine blast radius; ensure least-privilege DB users and restrict write permissions.
  • Agent may attempt repeated mutations without idempotency; add confirmation/approval steps and consider idempotent patterns.

Alternatives

Full Evaluation Report

Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for mcp-server-prisma.

AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes

$99

Package Brief

Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.

Delivered within 10 minutes

$3

Score Monitoring

Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.

Continuous monitoring

$3/mo

Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.

8642
Packages Evaluated
17761
Need Evaluation
586
Need Re-evaluation
Community Powered