ask-starknet-mcp-server
Provides a Zed Editor context server/extension that exposes the ask-starknet MCP server tools inside Zed, letting an AI assistant query Starknet blockchain data and (optionally) deploy/interact with smart contracts using configured RPC and LLM provider keys.
Score Breakdown
⚙ Agent Friendliness
🔒 Security
README shows direct inclusion of a Starknet private key in Zed configuration, which is risky. LLM API keys are also required. The extension’s transport security (TLS) and secret redaction/logging behavior are not described, so scores are conservative. No mention of least-privilege scopes or hardened signing/approval flows.
⚡ Reliability
Best When
You want to run Starknet tooling from an interactive AI coding environment (Zed) and already have (or are comfortable building) the underlying ask-starknet MCP server.
Avoid When
You need a strict enterprise security posture with auditable key custody and least-privilege signing; this setup appears to accept a raw private key via configuration.
Use Cases
- • Ask an AI assistant questions about Starknet (block number, transactions, balances)
- • Assist with smart contract deployment and interaction flows from within Zed
- • Agentic workflows in Zed that rely on MCP tool calls to Starknet
Not For
- • Production custody/signing of large amounts of funds without additional key-management controls
- • Environments where you cannot provide or protect private keys and LLM API keys
- • Use cases requiring a documented, standalone public API endpoint (this is an editor extension/context server)
Interface
Authentication
The README indicates API keys are configured in Zed settings. It also optionally accepts a Starknet private key for transactions, which is a high-risk secret-handling scenario.
Pricing
No pricing details provided; costs likely depend on the chosen LLM provider and Starknet RPC usage.
Agent Metadata
Known Gotchas
- ⚠ Agent may trigger transaction-creating tools if a Starknet private key is configured; ensure the assistant has appropriate guardrails
- ⚠ Configuration requires an absolute ask-starknet path; relative paths may break startup
- ⚠ Missing/incorrect LLM API key will prevent tool access depending on provider selection
- ⚠ The setup relies on building ask-starknet locally, which may introduce environment/setup drift
Alternatives
Full Evaluation Report
Comprehensive deep-dive: security analysis, reliability audit, agent experience review, cost modeling, competitive positioning, and improvement roadmap for ask-starknet-mcp-server.
AI-powered analysis · PDF + markdown · Delivered within 30 minutes
Package Brief
Quick verdict, integration guide, cost projections, gotchas with workarounds, and alternatives comparison.
Delivered within 10 minutes
Score Monitoring
Get alerted when this package's AF, security, or reliability scores change significantly. Stay ahead of regressions.
Continuous monitoring
Scores are editorial opinions as of 2026-04-04.