{"id":"testdasi-gluster-server","name":"gluster-server","homepage":"https://hub.docker.com/r/testdasi/gluster-server","repo_url":"https://hub.docker.com/r/testdasi/gluster-server","category":"storage","subcategories":[],"tags":["storage","distributed-filesystem","glusterfs","infrastructure","server"],"what_it_does":"GlusterFS server implementation/package for building and running a GlusterFS distributed storage cluster (volumes, bricks, replication/erasure coding, management, and client connectivity).","use_cases":["On-prem distributed file storage for Linux environments","Replicated or distributed storage clusters for applications needing POSIX-like file semantics","Building storage infrastructure for home labs and enterprise on-prem setups"],"not_for":["Multi-tenant SaaS use where a service API would be preferable to running a server","Use cases requiring strict POSIX guarantees without considering GlusterFS semantics","Environments where you cannot administer kernel/user services and network ports"],"best_when":"You control the underlying infrastructure and can operate GlusterFS servers (networking, storage drives, and cluster configuration).","avoid_when":"You need a simple managed API/SaaS offering or require strong guidance for agent-driven, programmatic interactions via documented HTTP endpoints.","alternatives":["Ceph (RADOS/RBD, RGW) for distributed storage","MinIO for S3 object storage (different semantics)","NFS/SMB for simpler shared storage (single-server or simpler HA setups)","Lustre for HPC-oriented parallel file systems"],"af_score":27.5,"security_score":31.8,"reliability_score":35.0,"package_type":"mcp_server","discovery_source":["docker_mcp"],"priority":"low","status":"evaluated","version_evaluated":null,"last_evaluated":"2026-04-04T21:24:05.193157+00:00","interface":{"has_rest_api":false,"has_graphql":false,"has_grpc":false,"has_mcp_server":false,"mcp_server_url":null,"has_sdk":false,"sdk_languages":[],"openapi_spec_url":null,"webhooks":false},"auth":{"methods":[],"oauth":false,"scopes":false,"notes":"GlusterFS server operations are typically performed via system administration and cluster management tools rather than an application-level API with documented auth methods."},"pricing":{"model":null,"free_tier_exists":false,"free_tier_limits":null,"paid_tiers":[],"requires_credit_card":false,"estimated_workload_costs":null,"notes":"Self-hosted open-source infrastructure; costs depend on hardware and operations."},"requirements":{"requires_signup":false,"requires_credit_card":false,"domain_verification":false,"data_residency":[],"compliance":[],"min_contract":null},"agent_readiness":{"af_score":27.5,"security_score":31.8,"reliability_score":35.0,"mcp_server_quality":0.0,"documentation_accuracy":35.0,"error_message_quality":0.0,"error_message_notes":null,"auth_complexity":90.0,"rate_limit_clarity":0.0,"tls_enforcement":40.0,"auth_strength":25.0,"scope_granularity":0.0,"dependency_hygiene":50.0,"secret_handling":50.0,"security_notes":"As a server component, security primarily depends on deployment practices (network segmentation, firewalling, and transport security where applicable) rather than an application API with OAuth/API keys. Without provided repository documentation/manifests here, scores are necessarily conservative and reflect limited observable interface/auth controls.","uptime_documented":0.0,"version_stability":55.0,"breaking_changes_history":40.0,"error_recovery":45.0,"idempotency_support":"false","idempotency_notes":null,"pagination_style":"none","retry_guidance_documented":false,"known_agent_gotchas":["Primarily an infrastructure/server package: agent automation would rely on CLI/config management rather than stable, documented HTTP resources.","Operational changes may be stateful; reruns may not be idempotent without careful orchestration.","Cluster operations can have timing/state propagation delays (heal, rebalance) that can confuse automated workflows."]}}