{"id":"rslota-fcm-http2-mock-server","name":"fcm-http2-mock-server","homepage":"https://hub.docker.com/r/rslota/fcm-http2-mock-server","repo_url":"https://hub.docker.com/r/rslota/fcm-http2-mock-server","category":"devtools","subcategories":[],"tags":["firebase","fcm","http2","mock-server","notifications","testing","devtools"],"what_it_does":"An HTTP/2-based mock server intended to emulate Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) HTTP/2 behaviors for testing clients and integration flows without calling the real FCM service.","use_cases":["Local/integration testing of FCM client request/response handling","E2E tests for notification sending workflows without external dependencies","Development of retry/error-handling logic around FCM interactions","CI tests that need deterministic FCM-like responses"],"not_for":["Production notification delivery","Security-sensitive environments where request spoofing could be confused with real service behavior","Load/stress testing that relies on realistic FCM performance characteristics"],"best_when":"You need a controllable, offline substitute for FCM HTTP/2 during development or automated tests.","avoid_when":"You require real FCM semantics, quotas, authentication enforcement, or response timing fidelity beyond basic mock behaviors.","alternatives":["Use a staging project with the real FCM API","Mock at the HTTP layer in your test harness (e.g., wiremock/nock/polly)","Use a generic HTTP server mock framework with prerecorded fixtures"],"af_score":38.0,"security_score":25.0,"reliability_score":25.0,"package_type":"mcp_server","discovery_source":["docker_mcp"],"priority":"low","status":"evaluated","version_evaluated":null,"last_evaluated":"2026-04-04T21:27:41.596116+00:00","interface":{"has_rest_api":false,"has_graphql":false,"has_grpc":false,"has_mcp_server":false,"mcp_server_url":null,"has_sdk":false,"sdk_languages":[],"openapi_spec_url":null,"webhooks":false},"auth":{"methods":[],"oauth":false,"scopes":false,"notes":null},"pricing":{"model":null,"free_tier_exists":false,"free_tier_limits":null,"paid_tiers":[],"requires_credit_card":false,"estimated_workload_costs":null,"notes":"As an open-source-style mock server, pricing is typically not applicable; no monetization details were provided."},"requirements":{"requires_signup":false,"requires_credit_card":false,"domain_verification":false,"data_residency":[],"compliance":[],"min_contract":null},"agent_readiness":{"af_score":38.0,"security_score":25.0,"reliability_score":25.0,"mcp_server_quality":0.0,"documentation_accuracy":30.0,"error_message_quality":0.0,"error_message_notes":null,"auth_complexity":100.0,"rate_limit_clarity":0.0,"tls_enforcement":30.0,"auth_strength":20.0,"scope_granularity":0.0,"dependency_hygiene":40.0,"secret_handling":40.0,"security_notes":"As a mock server, strong auth/TLS enforcement is not guaranteed by the information provided. Treat it as non-production infrastructure and ensure it is not exposed publicly; do not rely on it for real security behavior. No evidence was provided about secure secret handling or dependency posture.","uptime_documented":0.0,"version_stability":30.0,"breaking_changes_history":30.0,"error_recovery":40.0,"idempotency_support":"false","idempotency_notes":null,"pagination_style":"none","retry_guidance_documented":false,"known_agent_gotchas":["Mock servers may not reproduce real FCM edge cases (auth failures, quota errors, per-request headers) so agent-driven integration testing can pass while production still fails.","If the mock only approximates endpoints, agents may need to adapt request paths/headers to match the mock’s expected contract rather than FCM’s exact one."]}}