{"id":"mcp-beagle-security-mcp-server","name":"beagle-security-mcp-server","homepage":"https://hub.docker.com/r/mcp/beagle-security-mcp-server","repo_url":"https://hub.docker.com/r/mcp/beagle-security-mcp-server","category":"security","subcategories":[],"tags":["mcp","llm-integration","security","agent-tools"],"what_it_does":"Beagle-security-mcp-server appears to be an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server package intended to expose security-related capabilities to LLM agents via MCP tools. However, no README/repo manifest content was provided in the prompt, so the concrete tool surface area, auth model, and behavioral details cannot be verified.","use_cases":["Provide security checks or security tooling to an LLM agent via MCP tools","Augment agent workflows with security context (e.g., scanning, validation, policy checks) if supported by the MCP server implementation"],"not_for":["Production security enforcement without independently validating the underlying tool behavior","Handling sensitive secrets unless the server is explicitly designed to avoid logging/returning them"],"best_when":null,"avoid_when":null,"alternatives":["Use a dedicated security API/service with a documented REST interface (OpenAPI + SDK)","Use an existing security scanner/agent integration framework with explicit auth, audit logging, and rate-limit guidance","Implement MCP tools in-house with well-defined contracts and test coverage"],"af_score":24.8,"security_score":21.5,"reliability_score":20.0,"package_type":"mcp_server","discovery_source":["docker_mcp"],"priority":"low","status":"evaluated","version_evaluated":null,"last_evaluated":"2026-04-04T21:34:58.659471+00:00","interface":{"has_rest_api":false,"has_graphql":false,"has_grpc":false,"has_mcp_server":true,"mcp_server_url":null,"has_sdk":false,"sdk_languages":[],"openapi_spec_url":null,"webhooks":false},"auth":{"methods":[],"oauth":false,"scopes":false,"notes":"No authentication details were provided, so this cannot be confirmed."},"pricing":{"model":null,"free_tier_exists":false,"free_tier_limits":null,"paid_tiers":[],"requires_credit_card":false,"estimated_workload_costs":null,"notes":"No pricing information was provided."},"requirements":{"requires_signup":false,"requires_credit_card":false,"domain_verification":false,"data_residency":[],"compliance":[],"min_contract":null},"agent_readiness":{"af_score":24.8,"security_score":21.5,"reliability_score":20.0,"mcp_server_quality":45.0,"documentation_accuracy":20.0,"error_message_quality":0.0,"error_message_notes":null,"auth_complexity":30.0,"rate_limit_clarity":0.0,"tls_enforcement":20.0,"auth_strength":20.0,"scope_granularity":20.0,"dependency_hygiene":30.0,"secret_handling":20.0,"security_notes":"Because no repository/README details were provided, scores reflect uncertainty. Security tool servers should be validated for: mandatory TLS, robust auth, least-privilege scope separation, protection against leaking secrets in logs/tool outputs, and safe handling of untrusted input.","uptime_documented":0.0,"version_stability":30.0,"breaking_changes_history":30.0,"error_recovery":20.0,"idempotency_support":"false","idempotency_notes":null,"pagination_style":"none","retry_guidance_documented":false,"known_agent_gotchas":["MCP tool servers sometimes return unstructured errors; without examples, agents may struggle to recover","Security-focused tools may require careful input redaction; without guidance, agents may pass secrets unintentionally","If tool operations mutate state (e.g., submitting scans), idempotency and retry semantics may be unclear without documentation"]}}