{"id":"kubesphere-kube-apiserver","name":"kube-apiserver","homepage":"https://hub.docker.com/r/kubesphere/kube-apiserver","repo_url":"https://hub.docker.com/r/kubesphere/kube-apiserver","category":"infrastructure","subcategories":[],"tags":["kubernetes","control-plane","api-server","rest","rbac","admission","etcd","authn","authz"],"what_it_does":"Kubernetes kube-apiserver is the core Kubernetes control-plane API server that exposes the Kubernetes REST API, performs authentication/authorization, validates requests, and coordinates persistence and admission of cluster state changes.","use_cases":["Providing the Kubernetes control-plane API endpoint for kubectl, controllers, and automation","Managing cluster resources (create/update/delete) through the Kubernetes API","Enforcing authentication/authorization and admission policies (e.g., validating/mutating admission webhooks)","Serving as the hub for cluster state operations and watches (informers)"],"not_for":["Running as a general-purpose standalone web service unrelated to Kubernetes","Providing a simple CRUD API outside of the Kubernetes object model","Replacing etcd or node components; it depends on the Kubernetes architecture"],"best_when":"You need a production-grade Kubernetes control plane with a consistent API surface for all cluster management operations.","avoid_when":"You need a lightweight single-purpose API or cannot operate Kubernetes networking, certificates, and control-plane dependencies.","alternatives":["Managed Kubernetes control planes (e.g., GKE/EKS/AKS)","k3s/rke2 control-plane distributions (still include an API server)","Direct etcd access (not recommended for cluster management)"],"af_score":55.0,"security_score":78.2,"reliability_score":58.8,"package_type":"mcp_server","discovery_source":["docker_mcp"],"priority":"low","status":"evaluated","version_evaluated":null,"last_evaluated":"2026-04-04T19:35:19.348204+00:00","interface":{"has_rest_api":true,"has_graphql":false,"has_grpc":false,"has_mcp_server":false,"mcp_server_url":null,"has_sdk":false,"sdk_languages":[],"openapi_spec_url":null,"webhooks":true},"auth":{"methods":["Client TLS authentication (x509 certificates)","Bearer token authentication (e.g., service account tokens, bootstrap tokens)","Webhook authentication (config-dependent)","Authorization via RBAC (Role/ClusterRole + bindings)","Webhook authorization (config-dependent)","Node authorizer (config-dependent)"],"oauth":false,"scopes":false,"notes":"Authentication/authorization is typically configured via Kubernetes flags and plugins; auth is generally strong and policy-driven (RBAC) but exact mechanisms vary by cluster configuration."},"pricing":{"model":null,"free_tier_exists":false,"free_tier_limits":null,"paid_tiers":[],"requires_credit_card":false,"estimated_workload_costs":null,"notes":"Open-source software; operational costs depend on your infrastructure and Kubernetes distribution."},"requirements":{"requires_signup":false,"requires_credit_card":false,"domain_verification":false,"data_residency":[],"compliance":[],"min_contract":null},"agent_readiness":{"af_score":55.0,"security_score":78.2,"reliability_score":58.8,"mcp_server_quality":0.0,"documentation_accuracy":20.0,"error_message_quality":null,"error_message_notes":"Kube-apiserver returns HTTP status codes and JSON Status objects for many failures; however, there is no single agent-oriented spec for retry/idempotency in the package interface itself. Agents must infer from Kubernetes conventions (e.g., resourceVersion for optimistic concurrency) and HTTP semantics (e.g., 409 conflicts).","auth_complexity":40.0,"rate_limit_clarity":30.0,"tls_enforcement":95.0,"auth_strength":85.0,"scope_granularity":75.0,"dependency_hygiene":60.0,"secret_handling":70.0,"security_notes":"Security is primarily driven by Kubernetes control-plane configuration: TLS (typically required), strong pluggable authn/authz (often x509 + RBAC), and admission controls. Secrets are generally managed outside the API server process, but operational misconfiguration (weak certs, overly broad RBAC, insecure webhook endpoints) can undermine security. Dependency hygiene cannot be fully assessed from the provided data.","uptime_documented":50.0,"version_stability":70.0,"breaking_changes_history":60.0,"error_recovery":55.0,"idempotency_support":"true","idempotency_notes":"Many operations can be made idempotent by using PUT on known resource URLs, or by using server-side apply/patch semantics carefully; updates may not be idempotent without correct preconditions (e.g., resourceVersion/conditions) and conflict handling (409).","pagination_style":"watch-based","retry_guidance_documented":false,"known_agent_gotchas":["Optimistic concurrency via resourceVersion: updates can fail with 409 Conflict if preconditions are stale","Some write operations are not strictly idempotent unless using the right HTTP method/strategy and preconditions","Large list operations are commonly handled with pagination parameters and/or watches; naive listing may be expensive","Authorization failures (403) vs authentication failures (401) depend on configured authn/authz; agents should not retry blindly on 4xx","Admission webhooks can introduce latency and intermittent failures; agents may need to treat transient webhook errors as retryable depending on status codes and timeout behavior"]}}