{"id":"eigent-ai-toolathlon-gym","name":"toolathlon_gym","homepage":null,"repo_url":"https://github.com/eigent-ai/toolathlon_gym","category":"ai-ml","subcategories":[],"tags":["ai-ml","agents","mcp","benchmarking","tool-use","docker","postgresql","offline-evaluation"],"what_it_does":"Toolathlon-GYM is a self-contained, locally runnable evaluation/training environment for LLM agents’ real-world tool use. It provides 503 automated multi-step tasks backed by a local PostgreSQL database and orchestrated via 25 MCP servers, running each task inside an ephemeral Docker container with automated preprocessing and evaluation scripts.","use_cases":["Training and benchmarking LLM agents on heterogeneous tool use (files, spreadsheets, email, calendars, databases, etc.)","Evaluating long-horizon, multi-tool planning with a fixed step budget","Researching agent reliability and failure modes under controlled, locally simulated enterprise workflows","Developing and testing custom agent frameworks against a standardized task format and ground-truth evaluator"],"not_for":["Production deployment of agents for real business workflows (it is a benchmark/evaluation harness, not a managed service)","Use as-is without understanding Docker/PostgreSQL setup and the expected MCP toolchain","Security-sensitive environments where running arbitrary agent code or tool calls is not acceptable"],"best_when":"You want repeatable, offline (no live external APIs) agent evaluation for tool orchestration across many domains with automated ground-truth checks.","avoid_when":"You need a hosted SaaS/API offering with documented REST/SDK contracts, webhooks, or guaranteed SLA; or you cannot run Docker containers and a local PostgreSQL instance.","alternatives":["ToolBench","GAIA","WebArena/BrowserArena-style tool-benchmarks","Other MCP-focused agent benchmarks (if available)","Local simulation frameworks using MCP plus a small curated task suite"],"af_score":46.5,"security_score":41.8,"reliability_score":22.5,"package_type":"mcp_server","discovery_source":["github"],"priority":"high","status":"evaluated","version_evaluated":null,"last_evaluated":"2026-03-30T13:47:02.154607+00:00","interface":{"has_rest_api":false,"has_graphql":false,"has_grpc":false,"has_mcp_server":true,"mcp_server_url":null,"has_sdk":false,"sdk_languages":[],"openapi_spec_url":null,"webhooks":false},"auth":{"methods":["Environment variables for model provider credentials (e.g., MODEL_API_KEY) when using hosted model APIs"],"oauth":false,"scopes":false,"notes":"The benchmark itself is local/offline at runtime for data/tooling, but it still requires model provider credentials if you run with external LLM APIs (examples include OpenAI-compatible, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini). The README does not describe auth for MCP servers explicitly."},"pricing":{"model":null,"free_tier_exists":false,"free_tier_limits":null,"paid_tiers":[],"requires_credit_card":false,"estimated_workload_costs":null,"notes":"No pricing is described for the repository/package itself; costs depend on the LLM provider you configure (if any). The environment is local/offline for tasks and data, but model inference may incur external API usage."},"requirements":{"requires_signup":false,"requires_credit_card":false,"domain_verification":false,"data_residency":[],"compliance":[],"min_contract":null},"agent_readiness":{"af_score":46.5,"security_score":41.8,"reliability_score":22.5,"mcp_server_quality":55.0,"documentation_accuracy":55.0,"error_message_quality":0.0,"error_message_notes":null,"auth_complexity":60.0,"rate_limit_clarity":20.0,"tls_enforcement":60.0,"auth_strength":45.0,"scope_granularity":20.0,"dependency_hygiene":50.0,"secret_handling":35.0,"security_notes":"Local execution reduces exposure to external data drift, but the system still requires handling model API keys (shown as environment variables). The README includes a database connection user/password in plain text (camel) and does not document secrets management practices. The package depends on many third-party libraries and includes components that can interact with external services via certain MCP servers (even if tasks aim to be offline at runtime), increasing the need for careful environment isolation and secrets hygiene.","uptime_documented":0.0,"version_stability":35.0,"breaking_changes_history":35.0,"error_recovery":20.0,"idempotency_support":"false","idempotency_notes":"No explicit idempotency guarantees are described for task runs or evaluation outputs; tasks run in ephemeral containers and use an output directory keyed by timestamp.","pagination_style":"none","retry_guidance_documented":false,"known_agent_gotchas":["Tasks are intended to run sequentially because only PostgreSQL is shared across tasks (a lock file enforces this).","Credentials are required for external model APIs in the provided examples; misconfiguration will prevent runs.","Because task descriptions obfuscate tool/service brand names, agents relying on keyword matching may underperform; they should use actual tool calls and dataset context."]}}